Затова и писах империалистичната война на САЩ в Косово. Въпреки, че не са завземали територия. Това е една йезуитска (в лошият смисъл) война.

NATO's charter[edit]
Because the NATO actions in Kosovo were taken after consultation with all members, were approved by a NATO vote, and were undertaken by several NATO members, NATO contends that its actions were in accordance with its charter. Article 4, however, is silent as to the use of force and does not discuss under what circumstances force may be authorized.[6]

Article 5 of NATO's charter calls on NATO members to respond in mutual defense when any NATO member is attacked. It is unclear whether under the NATO charter force may be used in the absence of such an attack. Article 5 has been interpreted as restricting NATO's use of force to situations where a NATO member has been attacked. It has been argued, therefore, that NATO's actions were in violation of the charter of NATO.[7]

Т.е. спрямо документите на НАТО (член 4 и 5) е незаконна война, прогласувани от всички членове на НАТО (включително Гърция, която беше въздържала се май).

Взели си бяха поука 3 години по—късно и за Ирак вече нямаше подобни лицемерия и нарушения.