|
|
| Тема |
 Re: Neuropath [re: Roland_of_Gilead] |
|
| Автор |
ivz (любопитен) |
|
| Публикувано | 26.03.09 23:09 |
|
|
|
, , например добре се казва за качествеата на книгата като трилър (като каквато я оценявах): "For the seasoned thriller reader, Neuropath occasionally seems to be doing everything wrong. The novel lathers repetitive exposition sequences, stops dead in its track in-between plot beats, features a main character who can't be called a protagonist by sheer lack of initiative and reaches a climax thanks to the actions of third parties. Tom has to pop pills to alter his brain chemistry so that he can act, and even that can't help him but being a witness to the novel's final moments. You really have to look at the novel at a certain angle in order to appreciate all the genre-tweaking that Bakker does". Сигурно има и още, само че вече става късно. И какво още да говоря - аз съм аргументирал мнението си (впрочем не съм казал нищо чак толкова лошо с изключение на това, че книгата едва се чете), ти ми казваш, че има хора, които мислят иначе. Ами много хубаво... Е, и какво?
When you come to a fork in the road, take it...
Yogi BerraРедактирано от ivz на 26.03.09 23:14.
| |
| |
| 
|
|
