|
Тема |
Re: Ех да му се не види :( [re: Vladi] |
|
Автор |
salle (Един такъв) |
|
Публикувано | 31.07.02 00:13 |
|
|
Всичко което направих беше да цитирам www.indymotorspeedway.com
Много добре знам разликата между IRL и CART - кое е традицията и кое развитието изобщо не е важно.
Просто едно историческо обяснение защо в щатите предпочитат овалните писти нищо повече. Ето ти го и оригинала:
Why is it that Americans race on ovals? This seems to go all the way back to the beginnning of auto racing. Europe had a decent road structure before the auto was invented. The 1800's found America's horses and wagons blazing trails and muddy ruts as the westward expansion continued. When auto racing began at the beginning of the century, Americans turned to their dirt horse tracks to race on. Europeans skipped their "grass" horse tracks and used their roads instead. Hence separate traditions began that continue to this day, a century later.
С какво толкова те засегнах пак?
Цитат от същия сайт - точмо предишния абзац на това горното. Няма да го превеждам, че ще вземе някой пак да се обиди:
If F1 spends the most money on drivers, does this mean they have the best drivers?! Sounds logical. However, they do not tap the well of oval track drivers where most Americans race. Jeff Gordon is never going to get a chance at F1, even though he might be the best driver in the world. The world of F1 would like to have an American driver too! Not only because they now have an American Grand Prix, but because of American sponsors and the fact that they call their Championship the "World" Drivers Championship. The last American to get a chance to race in F1 was Michael Andretti, and this was because he had road course experience in the CART series. It didn't seem to go him much good though
|
| |
|
|
|