|
Какъв вид сервис се бие като втори е отделна тема, не виждам особен смисъл да болдваш чак. Силни плоски сервиси не се бият често като втори сервис, съгласен съм. Ама то плоският сервис е само един вид от всичките видове сервиси, не знам защо толкова си го заобичал. Но, дори твоите цифри показват два вида сервис (не знам как преброи 90%, аз мисля, че са повече процентите, но и видовете втори сервис са повече) и оставят 10% за, предполагам 'плоски' сервиси. Значи разнообразието в сериварането няма да намалее. И пак да кажа - който има добър сервис винаги ще има предимство, със или без наличието на 2ри сервис.
По точка две. Ми да говоирм с факти:
Armed with point-by-point data from (most of) the men’s singles matches
at the French Open, we can take a closer look. The following table
shows three numbers for each of the 16 players who reached the 4th round:
Average rally length–that’s the total number of shots per point for every point that the player contested.
Percentage of points that reached eight or more shots.
Percentage of eight-or-more-shot rallies that the player won.
PLAYER Shots/Pt 8+ 8+Wins
Juan Ignacio Chela 5.3 25.7% 48.0%
Gilles Simon 5.3 25.7% 59.8%
Andy Murray 5.1 22.8% 50.5%
Viktor Troicki 4.7 19.2% 48.9%
Rafael Nadal 4.6 18.3% 56.5%
Robin Soderling 4.6 19.5% 55.1%
David Ferrer 4.5 16.8% 70.7%
Alejandro Falla 4.5 19.7% 47.9%
Gael Monfils 4.3 17.3% 44.8%
Albert Montanes 4.3 15.2% 46.1%
Fabio Fognini 4.3 15.5% 59.5%
Novak Djokovic 4.1 16.0% 63.6%
Richard Gasquet 4.0 13.9% 57.0%
Roger Federer 3.9 14.0% 49.7%
Ivan Ljubicic 3.7 11.8% 49.4%
Stanislas Wawrinka 3.6 11.1% 46.2%
Това е Ролан Гарос, където асовете и сервис уинърите не са кой-знае колко. Колко разигравания продължават на 8 удара? Ами виж сам, 1/4 е най-голямото число и то при играчи, които са 100% бейслаънъри. Така че това с 10+ удара ти звучи логично, ама няма като как да стане.
Ето още ( -да, има и такива):
In a recent study during a high level collegiate tennis tournament, the average point length was recorded as 6.36 (4.69) s.14 An athlete's playing style can have a large impact on the length of tennis points.18 When the player in control of the rally was an attacking player (hits the tennis ball hard and attempts to come to the net consistently), the average duration of the points was found to be 4.8 (0.4) s.18 Rally duration varied between 6 and 11 seconds (mean 8.2 (1.2) s) when the player in control of the rally was a whole court player (who plays from the baseline, but is very comfortable coming to the net).18 The points lasted on average 15.7 (3.5) s when the player in control of the rally was a baseline player (plays the large majority of points from the baseline, hitting ground strokes, and does not prefer to come into the net). This difference in duration was statistically significant (p<0.05).18 The percentage of the playing time with respect to the total time of the match (on clay courts) has been shown to be approximately 21 (5.5)% for the attacking players, 28.6 (4.2)% for whole court players, and 38.5 (4.9)% for baseline players.18 In an earlier study, the percentage of playing time during match, on hard courts, was approximately 20%.19 From the research it appears that total playing time is only between 20% and 30% of total match time.
Колко ще продължи точката зависи най-вече от стила на игра, както виждаш.
Така че не съм съгласен с твоите аргументи и не мисля, че те са основание да се допуска втори сервис.
И на края да цитирам един от тукашните треньори - there is no such thing as 'second serve' - you get a chance to hit another first serve.
A man only sees what he wants to see...
|
Re: ЗА или ПРОТИВ [re: Henman]
