|
|
| Тема |
 Re: Елините в Тракия Родопите и Одесос [re: джинrиби] |
|
| Автор |
Setebos (минаващ) |
|
| Публикувано | 18.01.07 01:12 |
|
|
|
Ето и податки за разходки до Китай:
====================================================
"... The fifth millennium Neolithic village of Banpo, near Xian, China, has yielded pottery vessels incised with signs having striking parallels with the Vinča signs. The 22 different types of rectilinear marks, including
are also common Vinča-Tordos signs. Chinese scholars suggest that the signs were used for recording events or quantities and can be considered "precursors of writing".
The seemingly impressive correspondence between the Vinča-Tordos and Banpo signs does not imply diffusion of signs or sign usage..."
=======================================================
Дифузия си е! - 5600 Пр.Хр. - потопът в Черно море, доместикация на коня, Old European Script, степната магистрала, таримските мумии... "Fifth millenniumm" e само 10-тина века по-късно, сиан е столицата на първия единен китай, там където е пирамидата на Шъхуанди... <P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Редактирано от Setebos на 18.01.07 01:17.</EM></FONT></P>
предците на тохарите , излезли от същия Роден кръг - вж. по-горе 'тракийския ареал' --- A recent article (Hemphill and Mallory, 2004) reaches the following conclusions:
This study confirms the assertion of Han [1998] that the occupants of Alwighul and Krorän are not derived from proto-European steppe populations, but share closest affinities with EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN (!!!) populations. Further, the results demonstrate that such Eastern Mediterraneans may also be found at the urban centers of the Oxus civilization located in the north Bactrian oasis to the west. Affinities are especially close between Krorän, the latest of the Xinjiang samples, and Sapalli, the earliest of the Bactrian samples, while Alwighul and later samples from Bactria exhibit more distant phenetic affinities. This pattern may reflect a possible major shift in ... interregional contacts in Central Asia in the early centuries of the second millennium BC.
...
и образуването на тюрките:...
Tocharian A of the eastern regions seems to have declined in use as a popular language or mother tongue faster than did Tocharian B of the west. Tocharian A speakers probably yielded their original language to Turkic languages of immigrating Turkic peoples, while Tocharian B speakers were more insulated from outside linguistic influences. It appears that Tocharian A ultimately became a liturgical language, no longer a living one, at the same time that Tocharian B was still widely spoken in daily life. Among the monasteries of the lands inhabited by Tocharian B speakers, Tocharian A seems to have been used in ritual alongside the Tocharian B of daily life.
Редактирано от Setebos на 18.01.07 01:34.
| |
| |
| 
|
|
