Струва ми се, че напразно се нахвърляте върху човека...
Отлично знаете, че антисемитизма не е фикция
и дори понякога да се прекалява с употребата на това понятие би трябвало да сме внимателни в разглеждането на въпроси ,
свързани с неотдавнашната история.
Даването на квалификации на цели народи
и стереотипизирането им като лоши,
подли, работливи и.т.н. е
безсмислено , а понякога
и опасно...

Нека да си останем в руслото на историческото разглежданеи да подплатяваме постингите си с факти
-исторически документи,
анализи на известни историци и.т.н.
нека да дам пример с постването на превода
на един от "топсекретите"
от 1941 година:
..........................................
"TOP SECRET
MEMORANDUM

About Discussions [of Rosenberg]
with the Fuehrer on 14 December 1941

To begin with, I [Rosenberg] asked the Fuehrer
about my speech in the Sportpalast and referred
to several points which seemed to call for further discussion.
The Fuehrer was of the opinion that the speech was given prior to the declaration of war by Japan and therefore under different suppositions,
but in view of this, still desires to think over several points.
It probably would not be appropriate if I were to officially say that the provinces in the East were to remain under Germany.
I said thereupon that I, too, had considered this point, that one can probably only say that the Eastern Provinces [Ostland] will remain under German protection.
The Fuehrer was of the opinion, only to go so far that the provinces never would come under communism and now from the German side appear as secured.

I remarked on the Jewish question
that
the comments about the New York Jews must perhaps be changed somewhat after the conclusion (of matters in the East). I took the standpoint,
not to speak of the extermination [Ausrottung] of the Jews.
The Fuehrer affirmed this and said that they had burdened
the war upon us and that they had brought the destruction;
it is no wonder if the results
would strike them first.

The Fuehrer further said that he did not deeem it necessary to order forth the other nations to contribute as yet, since they can produce therein a legal claim for later.
He does that from time to time in single negotiations.
I told him that I, too, had written that down as a question.
I would comply with these instructions to edit more carefully the corresponding paragraphs in my speech.
The Fuehrer agreed throughout that
I had touched upon the Asiatic conflict.

Following, I laid before the Fuehrer the outline of a religious tolerance decree, to which the Fuehrer consented after
careful consideration.

Then I came to talk about the lecture of Professor Schuessler, to whom Dr. Dietrich had given instructions to evaluate the political testament of Peter the Great in an address.
Dr. Dietrich had not previously informed me thereon.
Upon my indication that this testament is a forgery out of the 18th Century, the Fuehrer thought that the authenticity was contradicted by a German Scholar in the 19th Century.
Thereupon I pointed out that this so-called testament was written in Polish circles and that it then was converted and changed by Napoleon in the political strife.
However, I would make an accurate check. I asked the Fuehrer for a general rule that if the Fuehrer had specific desires over the press
to have Dr. Dietrich inform me of these to insure a regulated working arrangement.

The Fuehrer replied to the question by the military commanders in the occupied Eastern territories about the marriage of persons belonging to the Armed Forces with inhabitants of these territories that no marriages
will be permitted during this war. After the war
a relaxation could be introduced to agree
with the political limits and blood relationship.

I then spoke about the relation with Reich Commissioner Koch and told the Fuehrer that Koch had, through various declarations, created the impression among the officers of the High Command of the Armed Forces (OKW) as if he dealt directly with the Fuehrer and otherwise decided to rule without Berlin.
Similar utterances that he made the law were made to collaborators and he also told me once that he regarded himself as coordinated.
I made it clear to him that here exists a distinct official relation. I spoke with him regarding the above and I hope that clarification over the cooperation will result. I have only the wish that the Fuehrer no longer will receive Koch alone but only in my presence.
The Fuehrer agreed immediately.

Then I told the Fuehrer of the visit by General Kitzinger, who said that he was assigned with the thrashing of the harvest.
For this purpose he was promised several divisions which have not yet arrived. Moreover, they took from him other units.
The Fuehrer said that he would see to it that a change will be enforced and that divisions will be given him.
On the conditions of the captured prisoners Kitzinger remarked that because of malnutrition [Entkraeftung] in the camps in his territory,
some 2500 prisoners die daily.
Anyhow, they are already unable to consume good food and one must count on it that not very many will remain.
Aside from that, the manpower in the country
is large enough-the land even partly over-populated.

I further asked the Fuehrer if he had scrutinized the memoir on the establishment of Turkish legions.
What I surmise, since the High Command of the Armed Forces (OKW) issued an order, is that beside the Turkish-Aserbeidschander Legion,
other Caucasian legions will be set up also.
The Fuehrer affirmed the question, and I once more referred to the danger of a panturanian movement.
I reported further about the petition of the Crimean tartars from Constantinople and the request to visit the prison camps and to inspect the countrymen.
I told the Fuehrer that I had denied this request which he absolutely affirmed.
The only thing one could do would be to segregate the 250 captured Crimean tartars with respect to Turkey, and to handle them accordingly.
In conclusion, the Fuehrer once more emphasized that he later wished to have the Crimea cleaned out.
I told him that I, too, had given much consideration to the renaming of the towns and thought to rename Simferopol to Gotenburg
and Sevastopol to Theodorichhafen
-this according to the instructions of the Fuehrer himself.

Then I suggested a boundary settlement between Nikolajew and Transnistry to the Fuehrer,
because the way things are, the Rumanians can look into all the ship-building installations; just an insignificant regulation will prevent this. I had also made this suggestion to General Field Marshal Keitel.
The Fuehrer looked at the map and
agreed to such a boundary regulation.

Finally, I told the Fuehrer that I had in mind to go to Riga in January and to visit other territories during the next year.
I begged the Fuehrer to allow me to obtain several coaches for a special train. I have already started dealings over the procurement of such coaches in Holland. The Fuehrer thought this all right and agreed with my wish.

Thereupon I gave the Fuehrer an aforementioned letter of a Japanese scholar over the Japanese and National Socialistic Philosophy of Life as related to Christianity,
over which we talked for a long time.
The Fuehrer took the memoir with him, which immediately engrossed him.

Berlin, 16 December 1941"
......................................................
Source:
Nazi Conspiracy and
Aggression Volume IV
Office of the United States Chief Counsel
for Prosecution of Axis Criminality
Washington, DC :
United States Government Printing Office,
1946

Редактирано от tulsanew на 31.01.05 19:43.