Никой,
някои плодове не се забелязват с просто око. Не бива да се отчайваш, че съм инакомислеща; напротив ! Дотук обръщам интернет ресурси по философия само защото разбута любопитство, дремещо под привидната ми необезпокояемост;)))

Помниш ли как преди време си писахме за малките идеи и големите въпроси (в тема за мъж с бухалка, известен като Batman)?
Ето конкретни примери за философски търсения, намерили отговор в живота и Защо:

What major change in economy, market or knowledge would enable our company to conduct business the way we really would LIKE to do it ? The way we would really OBTAIN the best economic results ? The dominant question should not be "What should future society look like". This is a question for social reformer, the revolutionary, or the philosopher - not the entrepreneur.
Because it seems so limited, so self centered approach, historians have tended to overlook it. They have tended to be oblivious of the impact of the innovating businessman. The great philosophical idea has had, of course, much more profound effects. But, on the other hand, very few philosophical ideas have had any effect at all. And while each business idea is much more limited, larger proportions of them are effective. As a result, innovating businessman have had a good deal more impact on society than historians realize.

..the enterpreneurial innovation that has the greatest impact was that which converted the theoritical proposition of the French social philosopher, Claude Henri Saint-Simon, into a bank a century ago. Saint Simon had started with the concept of the enterpreuneur as developed earlier by his compatriot, the economist J B Say, to develop a philosophical system around the creative role of capital.

..while Thomas J Watson built a small and unspectacular business during the 1920s by designing, selling, and installing punch card equipment, the logical positivist e.g. Perry Bridgman in USA, Rudolph Carnap in Austria talked and wrote on the systematic methodology of "quantification" and "universal measurments"ґIt is most unlikely that they heard of the young struggling IBM company, and certain that they did not connect their ideas with. Yet it was Watsons IBM and not their philosophical ideas which became operational when the new technology emerged during WW2.

Параграф 22: При статистика откривам, че мнозинството от минаващите в клубовете :
а/ са чели Библията
б/поне веднъж са/ще ползвали(т) психотерапевт

Понеже не се класирам (и скоро нямам време да влагам усилия) в никоя категория, продължавам кротко да си чета. От време на време излизам да проверя докъде се стигна с лунното затъмнение. Някои науки дават обяснение в този ми живот ПОНЕ какво й е на Луната ;)))