Zdrasti Vlado,

Moeto stanovishte po temata za Prichastieto e po-dolu.
Za da razberesh konteksta na spora:
Reformaciata, kakto znaesh, revizira mnogo dogmati. Makar Luter i Kalvin da podurzhat realnoto prisustvie na Tjaloto i Kruvta Hristovi v Tainstvoto, naddeljava racionalnoto tulkuvanie na Zwingli i Oecolampadius - simvoli, prosto simvoli. Eto kakvo kakvo kazva Luter za tjah po tozi povod:

"damned . . . out of the Church . . . offspring of hell . . . heretics"

Eto kratko opisanie na konflikta:

'Luther, like the Catholics, believed that the bread and wine of the Eucharist
was spiritually transformed into the body and blood of Christ, while Zwingli believed that the Eucharist only symbolized the
body and blood of Christ. This was no mere quibble about a plain-tasting cracker and a few dribbles of wine. At the heart of the
dispute was the nature of Jesus Christ himself. For Luther, what made the spiritual transformation of the Eucharist into the
physical body and blood of Christ was the dual nature of Christ: as both God and human, Christ was both spiritual and physical,
God and human being. Zwinglian Protestantism, as well as its spiritual inheritors (the majority of Protestant churches),
overwhelmingly stressed the divine nature of Christ. Jesus Christ was the divine; the Catholic insistence on the human nature of
Christ was an incorrect and dangerous reading of the Christ event in history. Therefore, any implicit suggestion in the practice of
the Eucharist that Christ was human must be rejected.'

Eto kak e vizhdal neshtata Zwingli:

'I believe that in the holy meal of the eucharist, the true body of Christ is present in the mind of the believer; that is to say that those who thank the Lord for the benefits conferred on us in his son acknowledge that he became true flesh, truly suffered therein and truly washed away our sins by his blood. Thus everything done by Christ becomes as it were present to them in their believing minds.'

Vsicho e subektivno, v uma na vjarvashtite, mislen paralel, a ne realno tainstvo (interesno togava shto li ap.Pavel preduprezhdava za opasnostta ot nedostoino prichastie?).

Interesno e, che pochti vsichki protestanski razklonenija vuzpriemat erestta na Zwingli...
Obache, v njakoi 'nezavisimi curkvi' njakoi hora sa se usetili che tova e luzheuchenie i sa pochnali da gravitirat kum Luterovoto shvashtane. Pri vse tova, umuvaneto im ostava protestansko, kompromisno, racionalistichno i ne gi priblizhava osobeno kum Pravoslavieto.
Za zhalost...

Съдържаниет е скрито
Влезте за да го видите