spisache,predlozhenie

nqkoi predlozhi shtatite za svetoven politzai,i tova me nakara da potatsq kade v sveta ima konflikti za razreshavane,spored oon prez 2000 zaradi naryshavne nachoveshkite im prava sa izbqgali hora ot slednite darzavi :Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Belarus
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and H.
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Central African Rep.
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo
Cфte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Czech Rep.
Dem. Rep. of Congo
Djibouti
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
FYR Macedonia
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iraq
Islamic Rep. of Iran
Israel
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Dem. Rep.
Latvia
Lebanon
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamah.
Lithuania
Mali
Mauritania
Mexico
Morocco
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Occup. Palest. Territ.
Pakistan
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Rep. of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Slovakia
Slovenia
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Stateless
Sudan
Suriname
Syrian Arab Rep.
Tajikistan
Thailand
Tibetans
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United Rep. of Tanzania
United States
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Viet Nam
Western Sahara
Yemen
Yugoslavia, FR
Zimbabwe
i tai kato vsichko pravqt ot dobra volq,mozhe spokoino da prodalzhat kato pretzenqt reda v saotvetsvie sas statistikata [линк]

Ti nali pravish razlika m/u narushavane na choveshkite prava..i izbivane na choveshki sastestva

chovek ima pravo na zhivot,nali ne trqbva da ti tzitiram tzqlata harta za pravata na choveka[линк]

Saglasen..i kakvo triabva da se pravi s onia deto ti otnemat tova pravo..na jivot i na rabota i na izbor...da gi ostavim da si se mnojat i da im stavat golemi mustacite?...a be sto vsichki "pichove" imat mustaci?-Hitler,Stalin,Sadam/svarzano li e nesto s razmera na pishkite ili

ami ako iskash shtatite da badat svetoven politzai trqbva da otmenqt edno zakonche a imenno onova deto zabranqva ybiistvoto na chyzhdi darzhavni glavi taka i v iugoslaviq i v irak shtqha da sa svarshili otdavna bez da razpalvat teroristichni valni po sveta,

Ami tova zakonche e napraveno inache za taia cel..da ne hrumne na niakoi nehranimaiko/v USA/ da razchisti
Stoto pri edna voenna akcia ima publichnost i vaprosi i otgovori,to pri edni mrasni operaciiki..nikoi nisto ne znae,a kontrola e vedomstven.
Tova ne e policai,a ubiec...

e ti me prebi,napravo nqmam dymi vchera shteshe da me preprashtash kam amerikantskoto zakonodatelstvo a dnes pokazvash che vsashtnost si dosta dalech ot nego,pak shte napomnq che anglo-saksonskoto pravo e PREDZEDENTNO,tozi zakon e priet sled razsledvane na senatska komisiq razsledvashta nqkolko izdanki na taq tema,potarsi v bibliotekata,

Ami naali tova ti obiasniavam...priet e zastoto ima precedent..i tozi precedent e pokazal, che taka ne triabva...eto ti i otgovora na vaprosa ti"zasto amerikancite ne ubivat darjavni glavi"
Ti pomnish li si vaprosite ili govorish na parche?
Za takava i publichnost stava vapros..kogato deistva vedomstvo po spec operacia..kontrola e vatreshen i niama "vaprosi"...nestata stavat debeli i nekontroliruemi/ili po-tochno kontrolirani ot shepa hora/

mda,a za koi predzedent stava vapros

ne otgovarqsh ta se zachydih ne znesh za ``predzedenta``,ili nai nakraq se yseti che te podhlazvam

As reported by The Guardian, in the wake of Sept. 11th, Bush quietly lifted a 25-year ban on CIA assasinations. Calling political assasinations a "defensive" move against attacks on amerikan lives, Bush's new order targets a wide range of "terrorists" for covert, US-sponsored murder: "The US president, according to senior government officials quoted by the Post, signed an order last month known as an intelligence 'finding,' which broadens the list of potential targets beyond Bin Laden and his immediate circle of some 15 operational planners - and beyond Afghanistan."

As with the new domestic "anti-terrorist" legislation, there can be no doubt that this order will serve to destroy oppostion to US economic policies of genocide. Past targets of CIA assasination campaigns included such terrorists as Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, and Salvador Allende.

precedenti ima..kontrola e truden.

malko izvyn temata
tia sites deto gi pastevash po msg ite ti- super qki, eto ti edin ot men
[линк] (v sluchai che go nqmash)

Sorry but my Karma just ran over your dogma.

mersi

yvazhaemi george do monenta az pravih malka manipylatziq,izhozhdaiki ot tova che slabo poznavash statite napisah 3 fakta i edno tvardenie koeto ne e vqrno(dazhe nevqrnata dymichka q napisah s golemi bykvi kato predyprezhdenie),kakto i ochakvah otgovori bez da osporish nevqrnoto tvardenie,koeto spored men govori za nyzhdata ti ot kymir,koito da bogotvorish
ot dryga strana ti mi otgovori s tzitat ot vestnik koito ili e tzenzyriran ili manipyliran,s koeto oshte vednazh dokazvash che v shtaite prosto nqma mediq koqto da ne otrazqva pravilno pravitelstvanata politika,

...a ako si spomniash sedesarite v pyrvite si godini kakvi bradi imaha...syshtinski talibani.i logichno-gledai samo kakva talibanska demokracia napraviha.v sofia stana vsekidnevie da gyrmiat bombi navsiakyde,na vseki konteiner se padat po dvama kloshari,ako iskash da konkurirsh niakoia goliama (bogoizbrana,pravitelstvena) firma i ti chupiat glavata,inache ako ne si biznesmen bachkash syshto tolkova usyrdno kakto horata iz evropa,a ti davat samo trohi...10% ot tova,koeto vzimat navyn,a kato reshish da si kupish neshto se okazva,che iziskvat syshtite pari,kato na onezi,deto bachkat syshtoto kato tebe ama vzimat 90% poveche.reketirat te da plashtash na dva pensiaonni fonda (tva go niama nikyde),skoro shte plashtash i na dve zdravni kasi ednovremenno (i tva go niama nikyde),ako si ciganin nikoi ne te vzema na rabota i riskuvash da te prebiat niakvi brysnati kompleksari na centyra na grada...
ei za tova e dobre bush da bombardira i bulgaria,syglasen li si?az lichno ne.predpochitam da dorasnem sami do svobodata si i da si ia izvoiuvame sami.shtoto samo taka tia shte ima niakakva cennost.ako ti ia podariat-mnogo byrzo shte ia zagubish.gledai kvo stava v kosovo,v afghanistan ,v irak...horata ne mogat da boraviat s neshto,koeto ne razbirat i za koeto ne sa polojili nikakvi usilia.vse pak,nai-dobriat primer tuk e nai-novata istoria na bulgaria.ne onazi,deto shte sedi v uchebnicite sled niakoia godinka,a tazi,koiato vseki ot nas e vidial i izpital na sobstven gryb.

Naprotiv-viarno e..ima banvane na assasins ot CIA,viarnoe e che ima precedenti..i zatova ot 25g go ima toia zakon...
I ne razbrah,kakva e manipulaciata...che si priznavat,che sa varshili/opitvali/politicheski ubiistva??...
A tia nesta s bogotvorenieto......ne razbrah..CIA li sa mi kumiri..ili Guardian,che si priznava zapoliticheskite ubiistva...ti angliiski znaesh li?

Past targets of CIA assasination campaigns included such terrorists as Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, and .
Salvador Allende
ako se sehtash koga se razvihrq watergate shte se setish i za godinata v koqto senatskata komisiq kontrolirashta tainite operatzii reshava da azakove posledniq piron v skandala,ei taka za po-sigyrno,za sazhalenie zakoncheto nqma nishto obshto sas zabranata na ybiistvata,prosto se iska potvarzhdavane na izdadenata ot prezidenta zapoved i ot komisiqta,kakto kazah podhlaznah te a ti se hvana,prosto sledvashtiq pat si pomisli kogato shte preprashtash nqkogo kam amerikantskoto zakonodatelstvo,

Ne razbrah kakvo se opitvash da kajesh,che niama zabrana za politicheski uvbiistva..ili che niama precedenti?..ti za kakvo govorish?..Ia vij po-gore za kakvo sme govorili

kakto otbelqzah i na drygo mqsto ti imash nqkakva svoq izmislena teza i tarsish dokazatelstva v neina podkrepa izpolzvaiki tova az sglobih moq teza koqto ti tragna da razvivash bez da znaesh za kakvo stava vapros,kakto i predi tova za koeto pisha go vzeh ot bibliotekata,kakto vizhdam ne ti stigna tzql den da proverish za kakvo stava vapros,sazhalqvam no tai kato znaesh angliiski mi se stryva nai-dobre da vzemesh da namerish originala na protokola ot zakliuchitelnoto zasedanie na senatskata komisiq(malko pomosht veche nameknah za koi godini stava vapros) i edno malko poqsnenie predzedentite sa resheni ot SAD slychai chieto reshenie se izpolzva pri reshavane na analogichni dela,kakto sam sigyrno si zabelqzal izpolzvah tova che ne vladeesh iuridicheskata terminologiq koeto dovede do tova che ti vsashtnost ne znaesh za kakvo sporish no vapreki tova govorish smelo s politicheska ybedenost,s koeto dokaza tezata na manipylatziqta ot moq strana(a tezata e izlozhena v parvoto izrechenie),sled kato se podgotvish po vaprosa mozhe pak da drasnesh nqkoi red

-Ti nali pravish razlika m/u narushavane na choveshkite prava..i izbivane na choveshki sastestva/George/

-chovek ima pravo na zhivot,nali ne trqbva da ti tzitiram tzqlata harta za pravata na /nepip/

-Saglasen..i kakvo triabva da se pravi s onia deto ti otnemat tova pravo..na jivot i na rabota i na izbor...da gi ostavim da si se mnojat i da im stavat golemi mustacite?...a be sto vsichki "pichove" imat mustaci?-Hitler,Stalin,Sadam/svarzano li e nesto s razmera na pishkite ili../george/

-ami ako iskash shtatite da badat svetoven politzai trqbva da otmenqt edno zakonche a imenno onova deto zabranqva ybiistvoto na chyzhdi darzhavni glavi taka i v iugoslaviq i v irak shtqha da sa svarshili otdavna bez da razpalvat teroristichni valni po sveta,/nepip/

-Ami tova zakonche e napraveno inache za taia cel..da ne hrumne na niakoi nehranimaiko/v USA/ da razchisti
Stoto pri edna voenna akcia ima publichnost i vaprosi i otgovori,to pri edni mrasni operaciiki..nikoi nisto ne znae,a kontrola e vedomstven.
Tova ne e policai,a ubiec.../george/
-
e ti me prebi,napravo nqmam dymi vchera shteshe da me preprashtash kam amerikantskoto zakonodatelstvo a dnes pokazvash che vsashtnost si dosta dalech ot nego,pak shte napomnq che anglo-saksonskoto pravo e PREDZEDENTNO,tozi zakon e priet sled razsledvane na senatska komisiq razsledvashta nqkolko izdanki na taq tema,potarsi v bibliotekata,/nepip/

-Ami naali tova ti obiasniavam...priet e zastoto ima precedent..i tozi precedent e pokazal, che taka ne triabva...eto ti i otgovora na vaprosa ti"zasto amerikancite ne ubivat darjavni glavi"
Ti pomnish li si vaprosite ili govorish na parche?
Za takava i publichnost stava vapros..kogato deistva vedomstvo po spec operacia..kontrola e vatreshen i niama "vaprosi"...nestata stavat debeli i nekontroliruemi/ili po-tochno kontrolirani ot shepa hora/george/

-mda,a za koi predzedent stava vapros /nepip/

-ne otgovarqsh ta se zachydih ne znesh za ``predzedenta``,ili nai nakraq se yseti che te podhlazvam/nepi/
-
As reported by The Guardian, in the wake of Sept. 11th, Bush quietly lifted a 25-year ban on CIA assasinations. Calling political assasinations a "defensive" move against attacks on amerikan lives, Bush's new order targets a wide range of "terrorists" for covert, US-sponsored murder: "The US president, according to senior government officials quoted by the Post, signed an order last month known as an intelligence 'finding,' which broadens the list of potential targets beyond Bin Laden and his immediate circle of some 15 operational planners - and beyond Afghanistan."

As with the new domestic "anti-terrorist" legislation, there can be no doubt that this order will serve to destroy oppostion to US economic policies of genocide. Past targets of CIA assasination campaigns included such terrorists as Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, and Salvador Allende.

precedenti ima..kontrola e truden./george

-yvazhaemi george do monenta az pravih malka manipylatziq,izhozhdaiki ot tova che slabo poznavash statite napisah 3 fakta i edno tvardenie koeto ne e vqrno(dazhe nevqrnata dymichka q napisah s golemi bykvi kato predyprezhdenie),kakto i ochakvah otgovori bez da osporish nevqrnoto tvardenie,koeto spored men govori za nyzhdata ti ot kymir,koito da bogotvorish
ot dryga strana ti mi otgovori s tzitat ot vestnik koito ili e tzenzyriran ili manipyliran,s koeto oshte vednazh dokazvash che v shtaite prosto nqma mediq koqto da ne otrazqva pravilno pravitelstvanata politika,/nepip/

-Naprotiv-viarno e..ima banvane na assasins ot CIA,viarnoe e che ima precedenti..i zatova ot 25g go ima toia zakon...
I ne razbrah,kakva e manipulaciata...che si priznavat,che sa varshili/opitvali/politicheski ubiistva??...
A tia nesta s bogotvorenieto......ne razbrah..CIA li sa mi kumiri..ili Guardian,che si priznava za politicheskite ubiistva...ti angliiski znaesh li?/george/

-Past targets of CIA assasination campaigns included such terrorists as Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, and .
Salvador Allende
ako se sehtash koga se razvihrq watergate shte se setish i za godinata v koqto senatskata komisiq kontrolirashta tainite operatzii reshava da azakove posledniq piron v skandala,ei taka za po-sigyrno,za sazhalenie zakoncheto nqma nishto obshto sas zabranata na ybiistvata,prosto se iska potvarzhdavane na izdadenata ot prezidenta zapoved i ot komisiqta,kakto kazah podhlaznah te a ti se hvana,prosto sledvashtiq pat si pomisli kogato shte preprashtash nqkogo kam amerikantskoto zakonodatelstvo,/nepip/

-Ne razbrah kakvo se opitvash da kajesh,che niama zabrana za politicheski uvbiistva..ili che niama precedenti?..ti za kakvo govorish?..Ia vij po-gore za kakvo sme govorili/george/

-kakto otbelqzah i na drygo mqsto ti imash nqkakva svoq izmislena teza i tarsish dokazatelstva v neina podkrepa izpolzvaiki tova az sglobih moq teza koqto ti tragna da razvivash bez da znaesh za kakvo stava vapros,kakto i predi tova za koeto pisha go vzeh ot bibliotekata,kakto vizhdam ne ti stigna tzql den da proverish za kakvo stava vapros,sazhalqvam no tai kato znaesh angliiski mi se stryva nai-dobre da vzemesh da namerish originala na protokola ot zakliuchitelnoto zasedanie na senatskata komisiq(malko pomosht veche nameknah za koi godini stava vapros) i edno malko poqsnenie predzedentite sa resheni ot SAD slychai chieto reshenie se izpolzva pri reshavane na analogichni dela,kakto sam sigyrno si zabelqzal izpolzvah tova che ne vladeesh iuridicheskata terminologiq koeto dovede do tova che ti vsashtnost ne znaesh za kakvo sporish no vapreki tova govorish smelo s politicheska ybedenost,s koeto dokaza tezata na manipylatziqta ot moq strana(a tezata e izlozhena v parvoto izrechenie),sled kato se podgotvish po vaprosa mozhe pak da drasnesh nqkoi red/nepip/

-Tova ti go puskam za da si izbistrish glava..uridicheski...
ima precedenti ima i zabrana..tvoito ne e manipulacia ,a prosto neznaene..ama ok..sega ste nauchish nesto poveche..cheti..
......
The CIA was involved, directly or indirectly, in plots against seven foreign leaders: Castro, Patrice Lumumba of the Congo, Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, President Salvador Allende of Chile, President Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam, President Francois Duvalier of Haiti and President Sukarno of Indonesia. Four of these leaders died violently, with the CIA's level of complicity and involvement varying widely.

All of this, including the details about the monkeys, the botulinum pills and the mob, is set forth in one of the most remarkable documents ever issued about the U.S. government, `Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders.' The 347-page report was made public in 1975 by the Senate intelligence committee then headed by Sen. Frank Church, an Idaho Democrat.

The committee also revealed that the CIA had a unit called Executive Action, which was in charge of planning to bump off foreign leaders, and something called the `Health Alteration Committee,' the purpose of which was exactly what its name stated. It was just such ghastly details--including the CIA's effort to infect Lumumba's toothbrush with a deadly African disease--that led President Gerald Ford to issue an executive order on Feb. 18, 1976, banning assassinations by U.S. agencies.

From that day forward, the United States, on paper at least, has been out of the assassination business. Every subsequent president--Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George Bush--has continued the ban. The Reagan executive order on intelligence, issued in 1981, still stands. It states: `No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination.'

That 22-word prohibition, is, of course, at the heart of the debate over the Bush administration's handling of the failed coup in Panama earlier this month against dictator Manuel Antonio Noriega.

Only last week, CIA director William Webster called on Congress and the president to give the intelligence agency greater freedom to deal with coup plotters, even if there is risk--and there usually is--that the target will be murdered. While the United States does not engage in `selective, individual assassination,' Webster said, the CIA's authority to deal with plotters should be more clearly defined.
...tova e ot congessional record...

terzai..