Тъй като тука сте специалисти по езиците и кръвта е по маловажна за вас ще ви дам изключително интересна информация.
Новите изследвания на учени лингвисти отричат индо-европейския произход на т.н. ИНДО-ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ЕЗИЦИ.
Те твърдят, че това всъщност са езиците на близкоизточните земеделци, които ги разнасят по света при експанзията си преди 10 000 години.

We test two theories of Indo-European origin: the 'Kurgan expansion' and the 'Anatolian farming' hypotheses. The Kurgan theory centres on possible archaeological evidence for an expansion into Europe and the Near East by Kurgan horsemen beginning in the sixth millennium BP7, 8. In contrast, the Anatolian theory claims that Indo-European languages expanded with the spread of agriculture from Anatolia around 8,000–9,500 years BP9. In striking agreement with the Anatolian hypothesis, our analysis of a matrix of 87 languages with 2,449 lexical items produced an estimated age range for the initial Indo-European divergence of between 7,800 and 9,800 years BP. These results were robust to changes in coding procedures, calibration points, rooting of the trees and priors in the bayesian analysis.


The estimated times strikingly confirm the Neolithic dispersal theory, showing a divergence of Indo-European languages from Anatolian ones, with an independent branching of the mysterious Tocharian language which spread eastwards, and the descent of all other languages from what is almost certain to be a Balkan homeland:

Съдържаниет е скрито
Влезте за да го видите