Клубове Дир.бг
powered by diri.bg
търси в Клубове diri.bg Разширено търсене

Вход
Име
Парола

Клубове
Dir.bg
Взаимопомощ
Горещи теми
Компютри и Интернет
Контакти
Култура и изкуство
Мнения
Наука
Политика, Свят
Спорт
Техника
Градове
Религия и мистика
Фен клубове
Хоби, Развлечения
Общества
Я, архивите са живи
Клубове Дирене Регистрация Кой е тук Въпроси Списък Купувам / Продавам 10:29 27.09.24 
Клубове/ Политика, Свят / Политика Всички теми Следваща тема Пълен преглед*
Информация за клуба
Тема Re: Ювиги ме изпревари!? [re: paзkoнcпиpaтop]
Автор Marquis de Sade (непознат)
Публикувано13.02.06 17:09  



Сериозно? Не мое да бъде...


Claim: The restaurant chain formerly known as "Kentucky Fried Chicken" changed its name to KFC to eliminate the word "fried" from its title.
Status: False.

Origins: First of all, let's dispense with one of the sillier claims circulating about this topic: The good folks at Kentucky Fried Chicken were allegedly breeding "mutant" chickens with extra-large breasts and additional legs (four, six, or eight, depending on which variation of this wacky legend you heard). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration stepped in and told Kentucky Fried Chicken that the genetically engineered creatures they were producing on their poultry farms could not legally be marketed as "chicken." Rather than give up the lucrative sales of meat from their big-breasted, multi-legged fowl to adhere to FDA regulations, the company deftly sidestepped the problem by changing their name to "KFC," thus eliminating all mention of the word "chicken" from their menu and advertisements.

Obviously, this tale is complete hokum, one of the many business legends concerning attempts to avoid government regulations through the expedient of a deceptive name change.

In 1991, Kentucky Fried chicken announced that it was officially changing its name to "KFC" (as well as updating its packaging and logo with a more modern, sleeker look). The public relations reason given for the name change was that health-conscious consumers associated the word "fried" with "unhealthy" and "high cholesterol," causing some of them to completely shun the wide variety of "healthy" menu items being introduced at Kentucky Fried Chicken outlets. The new title and image were designed to lure back customers to a restaurant now offering foods branded as "better for you," we were told.

It sounded good, but the real reason behind the shift to KFC had nothing to do with healthy food or finicky consumers: it was about money — money that Kentucky Fried Chicken would have had to pay to continue using their original name. In 1990, the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mired in debt, took the unusual step of trademarking their name. Henceforth, anyone using the word "Kentucky" for business reasons — inside or outside of the state — would have to obtain permission and pay licensing fees to the Commonwealth of Kentucky. It was an unusual and brilliant scheme to alleviate government debt, but it was also one that alienated one of the most famous companies ever associated with Kentucky. The venerable Kentucky Fried Chicken chain, a mainstay of American culture since its first franchise opened in Salt Lake City in 1952, refused as a matter of principle to pay royalties on a name they had been using for four decades. After a year of fruitless negotiations with the Kentucky state government, Kentucky Fried Chicken — unwilling to submit to "such a terrible injustice" — threw in the towel and changed their name instead, timing the announcement to coincide with the introduction of new packaging and products to obscure the real reasons behind the altering of their corporate name.

Kentucky Fried Chicken were not the only ones who bravely refused to knuckle under. The name of the most famous horse race in North America, held every year at Churchill Downs, was changed from the "Kentucky Derby" to "The Run for the Roses" for similar reasons; many seed and nursery outfits that had previously offered Kentucky Bluegrass switched to a product known as "Shenendoah Bluegrass" instead; and Neil Diamond's song "Kentucky Woman" was dropped from radio playlists at his request, as the licensing fees he was obligated to pay the Commonwealth of Kentucky exceeded the peformance royalties he was receiving for the airplay.



Цялата тема
ТемаАвторПубликувано
* Как се продава страх? †Ю⵴µ†   13.02.06 15:21
. * Re: Как се продава страх? V. Grig   13.02.06 15:32
. * Re: Как се продава страх? Pekoнcтpykтop   13.02.06 15:34
. * Re: Как се продава страх? V. Grig   13.02.06 15:43
. * Re: Как се продава страх? Джeйн   14.02.06 17:25
. * Ще направим проверка по сигнала †Ю⵴µ†   15.02.06 09:13
. * Re: Как се продава страх? drug   13.02.06 18:10
. * Значи според теб Дeдo Bи ToдЪp   14.02.06 10:42
. * Re: Как се продава страх? Pekoнcтpykтop   13.02.06 15:33
. * Re: Как се продава антисемитизъм? Pisgado   13.02.06 15:37
. * Тия са доказани †Ю⵴µ†   13.02.06 15:41
. * Re: Как се продава страх? lCO_FlN   13.02.06 16:12
. * Re: Как се продава страх? V. Grig   13.02.06 16:44
. * Ювиги ме изпревари!? paзkoнcпиpaтop   13.02.06 16:58
. * Re: Ювиги ме изпревари!? Marquis de Sade   13.02.06 17:09
. * Re: Ювиги ме изпревари!? V. Grig   14.02.06 11:00
. * Re: Ювиги ме изпревари!? Globalist   13.02.06 17:18
. * Ми страшни са, та. †Ю⵴µ†   13.02.06 17:30
. * Re: Ми страшни са, та. Pisgado   13.02.06 18:08
. * Re: Как се продава страх? †Ю⵴µ†   13.02.06 17:08
. * Как се продават ветсници? justaman   13.02.06 18:21
. * Започна да звучиш като тьотка †Ю⵴µ†   14.02.06 10:36
. * Хане, хане да те ... кой те хване Analyser   14.02.06 01:55
. * Само че миналата година му се понесе славата, Areнт   14.02.06 08:37
. * Е и? †Ю⵴µ†   14.02.06 10:25
. * Ти всеки който "прави пари" ли мразиш Analyser   14.02.06 11:50
. * Re: Ти всеки който "прави пари" ли мразиш DUAL   14.02.06 12:07
. * Не мразя никого †Ю⵴µ†   14.02.06 12:11
. * Re: Не мразя никого Pимл@нин   19.02.06 20:49
. * Re: Аналчо, аналчо... кви ги плещиш? Diletanta   14.02.06 10:42
. * Кретенче празноглаво Analyser   14.02.06 11:43
. * Говедце Diletanta   14.02.06 16:31
Клуб :  


Clubs.dir.bg е форум за дискусии. Dir.bg не носи отговорност за съдържанието и достоверността на публикуваните в дискусиите материали.

Никаква част от съдържанието на тази страница не може да бъде репродуцирана, записвана или предавана под каквато и да е форма или по какъвто и да е повод без писменото съгласие на Dir.bg
За Забележки, коментари и предложения ползвайте формата за Обратна връзка | Мобилна версия | Потребителско споразумение
© 2006-2024 Dir.bg Всички права запазени.