Masklin, прочети първо какъв е целия случаи около mozilla-debian-firefox-iceweasle. Проблема не е само в логото/брандинга. Ето ти една част от един thread във debian-users mailing list-а:


"On the Mozilla side:

- using the Firefox name and logo requires the distributor to use the
binaries provided by Mozilla
- "security" support is provided by shipping new upstream releases, with
zero help to distributors for backporting
- Debian's permission to use the Firefox name (which was given
previously) was revoked
- the Firefox artwork is non-free

On the Debian side:

- Debian policy requires that all packages be built on Debian
autobuilders (there are rare exceptions, but they are extremely few)
- Debian policy requires not shipping new upstream versions in stable
releases (that means backporting security fixes)
- Debian requires that security updates come from the Debian security
team (this creates a problem even if Debian acquiesced and released
the binaries from mozilla, since the first security patch would create
an unresolvable conflict)
- Debian requires that everything shipped in main be DFSG compliant (the
Mozilla Firefox artwork is not)

..."

В слуачая решението на debian ми се струва нормално и адекватно. Реално ти получаваш същия безплатен продукт просто със друг брандинг.