Ami OK da ti posocha togava text koito ne "namekva" a napravo go kazva cherno na bialo....ako beshe doprochel 1 straniza po nadolu na 4516 shteshe da vidish sledniat pasaz:
.........
Discretion (Substitution of Selection Criteria)
The IRP Regulations preserve the ability of an officer, with the
concurrence of a supervisor (described in the Regulations as a
“second officer”), to exercise discretion when they believe that
the total points awarded do not properly reflect an applicant’s
ability to establish in Canada from an economic perspective. A
selection system can be designed to reflect the factors that would
lead to economic success for the majority of applicants; it cannot,
however, reflect the specific personalized elements that might
lead to success or failure for every applicant. Therefore, the con-tinuation
of discretion has been considered to be desirable. Dis-cretion
can be either “positive,” whereby an officer believes that a
prospective immigrant who has not received sufficient selection
points should nevertheless be accepted, or “negative,” whereby an
officer believes that a prospective immigrant who has received
sufficient points should, nevertheless, be refused. In the past five
years, discretion, whether positive or negative, has been used to
make immigration decisions in only 2.3 percent of cases.
........

ili kakto veche pisah po predi i osobenno sega kogato s novite 80 tochki tolkova mnogo hora shte sa na ryba ili pod limita DA tochno roliata na IO stava neimoverno visoka t.k. v gorniat pasaz mnogo yasno mu se davat pravata po negovo usmotrenie (i s odobrenie na nachalnika mu) da dade na kandidata visa dori toia candidat da niama neobhodimite tochki.....razbira se tova raboti i v obratna posoka IO moze i ima pravo i da ne dade visa na kandidat koito sybira tochkite no spored IO ima prichini da mu se otkaze visa zaradi naprimer symnenia che shte se adaptira byrzo i lesno v canadskoto obshtestvo....

taka che tova koeto ti si zitiral niama otnoshenie kym tova za koeto az govoreh v moiat preden posting ...da IO niama da "...assign points under a specific selec-tion
factor." obache toi sys sigurnost shte ima pravata napravo da dade na candidata visa ako smetne che tova e opravdano....

tova kazva noviat pravilnik kym noviat zakon zitirah ti go zashtoto go iskashe.....eto sega shte ti zitiram i mnenie na edin ot nai dobrite imigrazionni spezialisti v Canada....

"....No, nothing is automatic. It will be up to the processing officer's
discretionary power to approve the application if in his or her opinion you
have good chance for successful establishment in Canada or to refuse it if he
or she thinks that regardless of your degree, etc. you will most likely have
difficulties finding any employment and may become a burden on our social
system. At the end it all comes to often subjective opinion of processing
officer and tons of those operational memoranda used to micro-manage the
program........."

ili ako se vyrneme na tvoeto originalno tvyrdenie koeto me nakara da te korigiram
" Napulno sum suglasen s tova, koeto pishesh. Rabotata e tam, che kolkoto i da si dobur v profesiata, ne uspeesh li da minesh pass mark ot 80 tochki niama da te pokani nikoi na interview, ako ste da si nobelov laureat. Niama go veche i "personal suitability factor", koito predstavliava subektivnata ocenka na interviewrastia. Taka che, nikoi niama da nauchi za vuzmoznostite na tazi asistent rejisiorka, bez tia da nabere neobhodimia minimum."

veche se vidia che tova koeto si napisal prosto v nikoi sluchai NE E VERNO!!!!
kolkoto da sa vazni tochkite te syvsem ne sa vsichko koeto se broi v prozesa i tova che ne sybirash 80/75 tochki po nikoi nachin ne znachi 100% che shte ti otkazat visa...

taka che verno dokumenta e goliam no e dobre da se chete v dylboki detaili predi da se komentira zashtoto izkazvaiki mnenie po neshto bez da sme napylno podgotveni moze da reflektira vyrhu sydbata (i parite) na mnogo chitateli v toia club koito idvat za da poluchat kompetentno i VERNO mnenie za predlaganite promeni.

Uspeh