takaaaa....sega eto ti zitat ot Operations Manual koito vseki officer na granizata pozlva i po nego ozeniava kakvo da te pravi, tam mu se kazva ako tova stane kakvo da pravi, ako si mrydnesh liavoto uho, kakvo da pravi i t.n. za nego toia Operation Manual e zakona i toi e odobren kato praktichesko izvlechenie o zakona s act na parlament.....ta razchitam da reshihme vyprosa koe e zakon i koe ne e...dano sled kato ne viarvash na CIC web site da poviarvash na Operations Manual :)))))))) Ili zakona = Operatin Manual kato yuridicheska sila i stoinost i Manual-a e prosto systematiziran v prakticheski klauzi zakon!!! tova ne podlezi na spor ot tuk natam

ta tam pishe taka (i cheti vnimatelno please):

4.4 Determining loss of permanent resident status
To form an opinion on whether or not a person has ceased to be a permanent resident,
you should consider the following factors:
a) a valid Returning Resident Permit (IMM 1228; see APPENDIX A)
b) a letter stating that the person has been or is employed by a Canadian company
operating outside Canada
c) a document pertaining to his or her attending school outside Canada
d) a document citing medical reasons for his or her tardiness in returning to Canada
e) notations, foreign visa stamps or forms in the person’s passport showing the status
granted in another country
f) the person’s intention at the time of departure, including:
• the date the person left
• the purpose of leaving
• the destination
• whether the person left his or her family in Canada
• the location of the person’s family, and
• what the person did with his or her assets
g) the person’s present intention: that is, when the person anticipates returning to
Canada permanently, if that is not the purpose of his or her current trip
h) the person’s links to Canada, including:
• financial assets (such as bank accounts, mortgages, loans, savings and so
forth)
• the length of time the person spent in Canada before leaving
• whether the person has a job to which to return
• what relatives the person has in Canada
• whether the person maintains a residence, and
• the reason for remaining outside Canada
i) whether the person has a job outside Canada
j) where the person’s family is located (and if not in Canada, whether they will be join-ing
him or her here), and
k) whether the person has more than one travel document (persons have been known
to try to hide previous trips outside the country by using more than one travel doc-ument).

takaaaaaaaa...kakto i slepzite vizdat....pritezanie na RRP e SAMO edna ot 15-20 iziskvania koito shte triabva da udovletvorish na granizata....
ako tochka (a) da priema RRP, kato edin ot mnooooooooogoto dokazatelstva priemlivi na granizata i tochka (j) da priema che semeistvo v Canada e podkrepiashto te obstoiatelstvo (s koeto az se syglasih otdavna).... to tochka (i) CHERNO NA BIALO pishe che rabota v chuzbina e obstoiatelstvo govoreshtu sreshtu teb....ha sega da te vidia dali shte syberesh smelost da priznaesh OCHEVADNOTO , kazvashe che "ne pishelo nikyde v zakona che rabota v chuzbina e problem" e sega ti namerih bash v zakona che go pishe chakam da go priznaesh che e taka please?

kak niakoi moze da tvyrdi che ako ima RRP tova mu "pochti garantira" vlizane v Canada e neshto nerazbiraemo z amen:))) ili sega shte opitash da se skriesh zad "pochti" ha ha vikash pochti moze da znachei 10% chance da go pusnat v Canada:)) e togava moze i da se syglasia s teb ako tvoeto "pochti" obache znachi 90-95% chance da vlezesh v Canada ha ha sorry ama NE E VERNO.....i ako predi reshish da sporish da ti dam za razmisyl oshte enshto pak ot Immigration Manual

"When presented at a POE and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, a returning resident permit is proof that the holder has not abandoned Canada as his or her place of permanent residence. Possession of a returning resident permit is neither a requirement to come in as a returning resident, nor is it a guarantee that the holder will be allowed to come into Canada."

Takaaaaaaa sega mi stava chak smeshno:)))).....ti si kopiral i paste mai samo polovinata ot tochkata v zakona ha ha ama plitki nomera igraesh i moze bi shtiaha da minat ako ne chetiah vnimatelno zeliat zakon/manual.....pravilno si otbeliazal che "ako NIAMA DOKAZATELSTVO v obratnoto to RRP e dokazatesltvo che pritezateliat mu ne e izostavil Canada kato mesto za postoianno ziveene...." obache neshto ti koito uz imash pretenzii che chetesh dobre si propysnal usloviaeto "ako niama dokazatelstvo v obratnoto" a ot po gorniat zitat podtochka (i) se vizda yasno che "rabota za chuzd rabotodatel E takova dokazatelstvo" ili da obiasnime tuk kashata po yasno.....tvoite priateli ako i da imat RRP ako sa rabotili za chuzd rabotodatel UVISVAT i tvoia zitat NE SE OTNASIA po veche za tiah zashtoto IMA dokazatelstvo che sa izostavili Canada...tochka (i) PRIEMA RABOTATA v chuzbina za takova dokazatelstvo!!!

I nakraia....shte te pomolia nai uchtivo da prevedesh za chitatelite na toia forum slednoto " Possession of a returning resident permit is neither a requirement
to come in as a returning resident, NOR is it a GUARANTEE that the holder will be
allowed to come into Canada."

tochno vzeto ot zakona!!!

i da se izvinish za prednoto si tvyrdenie che RRP "garantiral" vlizane v Canada ...e zakona /manuala kazva CHE NE E.....koi li e prav ti ili zakona/manuala?!?1:)))))

osven tova da mi otgovorish .....umishlenno li kato zitirashe predniat si posting zakona "propusna" polovinata ot chlena i tochkata?
nali razbirash che imam vsichki osnovania da se symniavam che umishlenno s zel da dokazesh tvoiata teza ti copu and paste samo chasta ot zakona koiato ti iznasia i "bez da iskash' propusna vtorata polovina koiato kazva "CHE RRP NE E NIKAKVA GARANZIA za vlizane v Canada"

ako umishlenno si go napravil.......hmmmm izviniavai ama ne e nikak pochtenno i haide niama da kazvam po silni dumi dokato ne chuuia kakvo imash da kazesh po vyprosa.......zablyzdavaneto na chitatelite tuk e losho...ama tiahnoto UMISHLENNO zabluzdavane e neshto koeto........hmmmmm shte izchakam s epiteta ...da chuia kakvo shte kazesh.....

Ili obratno to Square One...otkydeto pochna toia prinzipen spor.......

1)Otsystvieto ot Canada za nad 183 dni kato PRAVILO e osonovanie da zagubish LP (osven ako ne mozesh TI da dokazesh gornite 20-na tochki- koeto ne e nikak lesna zadacha, osobenno ako si RABOTIL v chuzbina za chuzd rabotodatel tova e NEVYZMOZNO!!!)
2) Rabota v chuzbina e SIGURNO obstoiatelstvo koeto v ZAKONA i ochite na immigration officer vodi do zaguba na LP
3) pritezanieto na RRP nito e zadylziteno nito e GARANZIA che shte opazish LP si!!!

otne mi dosta vreme da nameria tochnite alinei v zakona za da DOKAZA gornite 3 tochki, no si struvashe .....ideata che bilo "vyzmozno" da minesh granizata s lyzi, igri, moshennichestva i t.n. trikove.....ne ya preporychvam na nikogo.....dryzte se do zakona za da ste sigurni che ne nagazite luka.....
argumentite na Canadets po taia tema biaha dosta leki i neseriozni.....nepodkrepeni s fakti, nito primera mu za "priatelite mu" beshe doveden do krai.....tova koeto az mislia i dano toi si go priznae tuk publichno e che tia mu priateli nai veroiatno sa IZLYGALI za da poluchat RRP's a toi sam znae kakvo znachi tova.......ta tova ne e primer koito toi bi triabvalo da agitira tuk da byde sledvan.....osven tova ostavat v men symneniata za dosta "selektivno copy-paste ot nego s zel da zabludi men i ostanalite tuk)....dano ne e taka ......shte chakam da vidia kakvo toi ima da kaze po vyprosa .....

Uspeh na vsichki i ....dryzte se blizo do zakona;))