|
ПРИ ТАЯ ПАНДЕМИЯ И ПРОЧЕЕ БРОЖЕНИЯ И ЛУДНАЛИ ТЪЛПИ, ЗАПЛАШВАЩИ С ЕСКАЛАЦИЯ НА БРОЯ НА ЗАРАЗЕНИТЕ, НЕПОСИЛЕН ЗА ЕДНА ДЪРЖАВА, КОЯТО НЯМА РЕСУРСИТЕ НА ДЪРЖАВИ КАТО САЩ, РУСИЯ, БОГАТИ СТРАНИ ОТ ЕС и т.н. , застрашен е бизнесът, и големият, и малкият (моя е такъв), и средният бизнес.
АХТУНГ, ФАШАГИ! БРЕКИНГ НЮЗ!
ЩАТИТЕ РИТНАХА ОТЗАД ПОСЛАНИКА НА ЮКРЕЙН - ВАШИТЕ ПРИЯТЕЛЧЕТА. ДЕТО ЛАПАТЕ РОШЕН… И НЕМАШЕ БГ ШОКОЛАД. У МАГАЗИНИТЕ.
ЮКРЕЙН СЯ ЧЕ ВИДИ КОН БОБ ЯДЕ ЛИ…
НАМЕРИЛИ КОГА ДА МИ КЛАТЯТ ДЪРЖАВАТА... И ДА НАЛАГАТ СМЕНИ НА ПРАВИТЕЛСТВО.
ЧИСТ АНАРХИЗЪМ В ДЕЙСТВИЕ.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite -
не ли интересно,че на този език изписването е ЛУДИТЕ, КОЕТО на битов български език означава SOMEONE WHO HAS GONE MAD (CRAZY| - PLURAL.
А - се изговаря като българското ЛУД - MAD (CRAZY|. и още нещо съществено - ЛУДИТИ НА СРЪБСКИ ЕЗИК Е ИНФИНИТИВ НА ГЛАГОЛА ЛУДЕЯ, БЕЗЧИНСТВАМ, ВАНДАЛСТВАМ В ПРИСТЪП НА ЛУДОСТ.
Prevod rec po rec sa srpskog na engleski jezik srpski engleski napraviti ludim be fool praviti ludim be fool uciniti ludim craze
ВСЕКИ ДЕН ЩЕ ГИ ПРАВЯ ЛУДИ, ЛУДИТЧЕТА ПРОСТИ. БАРАБАР С ТЕХНИТЕ РОБИН ХУДЧЕТА. ПЪРВО МАЛКО ЗА ЛУДИТИТЕ И ТЯХНАТА ФРАПАНТНА ПРИЛИКА С ПОДИВЕЛИТЕ ГЛОБАЛНО ТЪЛПИ ОТ ЕСНАФИ.
Тяхната основна идея е, че ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ (РАЗБИРАЙ
КОМПЮТРИТЕ) И РОБОТИТЕ, КОИТО ТЕ,, НОВИТЕ пикльовци и пикли,
ДОКОПАЛИ СЕ ДО ВЛАСТТА ИНТЕРНЕТ-СЕКТАНТИ,
КОИТО ХИТРО ПОДРЕДИХА НЕЩАТА ЗА ДА БЪДЕ РЕАЛНОСТ СЛУЧКАТА
МЮЗИКАЙДЪЛ ПОЗДРАВИ… НЕМА СЕКЮРИТИ, ИМА ПРОТЕСТЕН no all protests КАПУТ!
ТИЯ ПИЧОВЕ СА СТО ПЪТИ ПО-КАЧЕСТВЕНИ ОТ ВАSS…
С ТОЗИ ФЛОЙД култ В САЩ.
НЯКОЙ ПЕРФЕКТНО Е ИЗПИПАЛ СЦЕНАРИЯ ЗА ТОЯ КАРНАВАЛ
НА БЕЗУМИЕТО. И ТОВА СА ТЕ. ПРОТЕСТЪРИТЕ ЛУДИТИ.
Лудити
от Уикипедия, свободната енциклопедия
Направо към навигацията
Направо към търсенето
Вождът на лудитите, гравюра от 1812 г.
Лудитите са СОЦИАЛНО движение от XIX век на английските производители на текстил, които ПРОТЕСТИРАТ, често унищожавайки механизирани тъкачни станове (ДОБЪР СИНОНИМ НА КОМПА, КОЙТО ТЪЧЕ В МРЕЖАТА) , обявявайки се срещу промените, предизвикани от промишлената революция.
Смятат, че тези промени ги оставят без работа (КОЙ СПЕЧЕЛИ НАЙ-МНОГО ОТ ВАНДАЛИЗМА, ЕПИДЕМИЯТА И ВАНДАЛЩИНАТА? КОМПЮТЪРНИТЕ СПЕЦОВЕ И ПРОВАЙДЪРИТЕ.)
и ПРОМЕНЯТ НАЧИНА ИМ НА ЖИВОТ (АМИ ДА,
ДРУГО СИ Е ВКЪЩИ ДА СЕДИШ ПРЕД КОМПА И ДА СЕ ШЛЯЕШ С ТЕЛЕФОНА) .
Движението е наречено на генерал Нед Лъд или на крал Лъд – митична фигура (МИТИЧНА И УДОБНА ЗА ЛЕНИВИТЕ ПРОТЕСТЪРИ) , за която се е смятало, че живее в Шеруудската гора, като Робин Худ.[1]
Съдържание
Възникване
Движението възниква ПО ВРЕМЕ НА ТРУДНИТЕ ГОДИНИ (РАЗБИРАЙ ПРИ КРИЗА) от и след Наполеоновите войни и ТЕЖКИТЕ УСЛОВИЯ НА РАБОТА В НОВИТЕ ТЕКСТИЛНИ ФАБРИКИ (ДЕМЕК В ОФИСИТЕ, КЪДЕТО ШЕФОВЕ, НЕ СЕ ПУШИ И Т.Н.) .
Главният протест на лудитите е срещу (АМИ ПРОТЕСТИРАТ СРЕЩУ ГОЛЕМИТЕ ОФИСИ С ГОЛЯМ БРОЙ ЮЗЪРИ, които могат да ги хванат в крачка) широките механизирани станове (С ДРУГИ ДУМИ – ЦЕНТРАЛЕН ПУЛТ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ), които могат да бъдат управлявани от евтина, относително неквалифицирана работна ръка, което води до ЗАГУБА НА РАБОТНИ МЕСТА за множество квалифицирани (ПРОТЕСТЪРИ) текстилни работници, които ползват ръчен труд. ТРАК ТРАК НА КЛАВИАТУРКЕН.
Движението (МИТИЧНО, ЕСТЕСТВЕНО) започва в Нотингам през 1811 г. и се разпространява бързо в Англия през 1811 и 1812 г. ФАБРИКИ И ОБОРУДВАНЕ СА ИЗГАРЯНИ от тъкачите и за кратко време лудитите са толкова силни, че дори водят сражения с британската армия. Много текстилни фабрики за вълна и памук са унищожени, преди британското правителство да потуши метежа.
Развитие
Лудитите се събират нощем по блатата (УЛИЦИТЕ И ПЛОЩАДИТЕ) , обграждащи индустриалните градове, където провеждат военно обучение (НЯКОИ ГО ПРАВЯТ, В РУСИЯ НАПРИМЕР ПИКЛЬОВЦИТЕ ОТ СЕТЬ ДРУЖИНКАТА, ЗА КОЯТО ОПОЗИЦИОНЕРИТЕ ЛУДНАХА, ЧЕ ГИ ТИКВАТ В ПАНДЕЛАТА, ДОБРИТЕ ДЕЧИЦА, ДОКАЗАНО УБИЛИ техни връстници момче и момиче, за което ги уведоми – за местата на останките, по телефона укрил се в Украйна член на ДРУЖИНКАТА СЕТЬ) , и често се радват на местна подкрепа. (АМИ ДА В РУСИЯ СЕ РАДВАТ НА ТАКАВА ПОДКРЕПА ОТ МЕСТНИТЕ ЛИБЕРАЛИ соросОхранениците ).
Главните области на бунта са Нотингамшър през ноември 1811 г., последван от Йоркшър през 1812 г. и Ланкашър от март 1813 г. Битките между лудитите и военните започват в Ланкашър при фабриката на Бъртън в Мидълтън, до Манчестър, и при фабриката на Уестингтън.
Магистрати и търговци на хранителни стоки са заплашвани със смърт и са атакувани от анонимния Нед Лъд и поддръжниците му (не е ли КУЛТЪТ ФЛОЙД В САЩ НЕЩО ПОДОБНО?) Някои индустриалци дори построяват специални камери в сградите си, които да могат да се използват като убежище в случай на бунт[2].
(АМИ В САЩ ЗАТВОРИХА С НЕЩО КАТО СТЕНИ ВИТРИНИТЕ НА СКЪПИ МАГАЗИНИ И НАЕХА ПАЗВАНТИ С БОЙНИ КУЧЕТА, ВЪОРЪЖЕНИ ДА ПАЗЯТ)
Чупене на станове (1812)
РЕАКЦИЯ НА ВЛАСТИТЕ
ЗА КАКВАТО В НАШАТА БАНАНА КЪНТРИ И В ЛИБЕРАСТЯСАЛАТА РУСИЯ МОЖЕМ САМО ДА ПОДСМЪРЧАМЕ
Мерките, предприети от британското правителство да потуши метежа, включват масов съдебен процес в Йорк през 1812 г., който приключва с МНОГО СМЪРТНИ И КАТОРЖНИ ПРИСЪДИ. Лудитското движение може да бъде разглеждано като ЧАСТ ОТ БРИТАНСКИТЕ РАБОТНИЧЕСКИ ВЪЛНЕНИЯ в началото на 19 век, (например въстанието в Пентридж през 1817 г., което е водено от БЕЗРАБОТНИЯ ПРОИЗВОДИТЕЛ НА ЧОРАПИ И ВЕРОЯТНО ХАЙЛИЛАЙКЛИ ДЕМЕК БИВШ ЛУДИТ Джеремая Брандит).
Селскостопански вариант на лудитизма, свързан с чупенето на вършачки, са Суинг бунтовете през 1830 година в южна и източна Англия.
ЕТО ЧЕ ВЪЗНИКВА И ЧЕРВЕНАТА ПЪТЕВОДНА НИШКА НА ИЛЮМИНАТИТЕ. ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ - СЪЗДАДЕНА НА 1 МАЙ - ПРЕВЪРНАТ В ДЕН НА ТРУДЕЩИТЕ СЕ.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalanguage
Изследването на Кевин БинФИЛД[3] е особено полезно, за да се постави движението в неговия исторически контекст – като организирано движение на производителите на чорапи, което е имало своите проявления от 1675 г. и по-късно, и самите лудитски бунтове са свързани с тежкото икономическо положение по време на Наполеоновите войни.
ДОЙДОХМЕ СИ НА ДУМАТА. БУНТОВЕ НА БЕДНИТЕ И УНИЖЕНИТЕ. ПОВСЕМЕСТНО... НЕ Е ЛИ МИНАЛО ДОСТА ВРЕМЕ ОТТОГАВА, ВСЕ ДА НЕ ИМ Е ТОЛКОВА ТЕЖКО ПЕРСОНАЛНОТО ИКОНОМИЧЕСКО ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ?
БАНАНИ БЕЗ ОПАШКА ИМА, КАРАТ ЗАПАДНИ КОЛИ, ФЪРЛЯТ ХИЛЯДАРКИ ОТ ТЕРАСИТЕ… АЕ СТИГА ВЕЧЕ.
„Унищожаването на машини“ (индустриалният саботаж) е обявено за углавно престъпление чрез закона Frame Breaking Act, 52 Geo. 3, c. 16[4] и Закона за вредителството (Malicious Damage Act of 1812, 52 Geo. 3, c. 130)[5] – законодателство, което е осъждано от Джордж Байрон FAQS U BE!, виден защитник на лудитите.
А УНИЩОЖАВАНЕТО НА ПАМЕТНИЦИ КАКВО Е?
А ГРАБЕЖИТЕ И УБИЙСТВАТА, ЛИКВИДАЦИЯТА НА СЪЗДАДЕНОТО ОТ МАЛКИЯ, СРЕДНИЯ И ДОРИ ЕДРИЯ БИЗНЕС ИМУЩЕСТВО В САЩ И НЕ САМО ТАМ КАКВО Е?
17 души са ЕКЗЕКУТИРАНИ след процес в Йорк през 1813 г. Много други са изпратени на КАТОРГА в Австралия. ИМАЛО Е МОМЕНТ, В КОЙТО СРЕЩУ ЛУДИТИТЕ СА ВОЮВАЛИ ПОВЕЧЕ АНГЛИЙСКИ ВОЙНИЦИ, ОТКОЛКОТО СРЕЩУ НАПОЛЕОН В ПОЛУОСТРОВНАТА ВОЙНА[6].
Трима лудити, водени от Джордж Мелър, залавят от засада и убиват собственика Уилиям Хорсфол, притежаващ фабрика Отиуелс в Марсдън, Западен Йоркшир. С изстрел в слабините Мелър смъртоносно ранява фабриканта. УБИЙЦИТЕ СА ОБЕСЕНИ В ЙОРК И ОТТОГАВА НАТАТЪК ЛУДИТИЗМЪТ Е В УПАДЪК.
УПАДЪК ЛИ?
ТОВА ГО РАЗПРАВЯЙТЕ НА НЯКОЙ ИДИОТ.
Съвременен смисъл
ТОЗ ТЕКСТ Е ЛЕПНАТ ЗА ЗАБЛУДА НА ПРОТИВНИКА (НА СНИМКАТА В ЦЕНТЪРА ДОЛУ В МОЯ ФБ НА ПРИЦЕЛ ВИ ВЗИМА МОЙ ИЗПИТАН АВАТАР) ТИЯ НЕЩО СЕ ОПИТВАТ ДА МЕ ПРАВЯТ НА ЛУД юзър ТУКА:
Днес „лудит“ се употребява за тези, които се ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯТ на индустриализацията, автоматизацията, компютризацията или на новите технологии изобщо[7].
ДАВАМ ВЕДНАГА ПРИМЕР ЗА ЛУДИТИ – ПРОТЕСТЪРИТЕ, КОИТО ТРОШАТ ЧУЖДИ МАШИНИ.
И зяпат в компа ми! Където има те таквиз нещица:
[печать] МЕЖВЕДОМСТВЕННЫЙ СОВЕТ ПО ОБОРОННОЙ ИНДУСТРИИ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ ПОСТАВОК * СОВЕТ МИНИСТРОВ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БОЛГАРИЯ
Дата выдачи 2019 г.
nuclear ТЕРОРИЗЪМ ЛИ?
ЩЕ ВИ СБРЪЧКАT!
ПОСЛЕСЛОВ
НОВ СВЕТОВЕН РЕД
The New World Order (NWO) in conspiracy theories is the hypothesis of a secretly emerging totalitarian world government.[3][4][5][6][7]
The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government—which will replace sovereign nation-states—and an all-encompassing propaganda whose ideology hails the establishment of the New World Order as the culmination of history's progress. Many influential historical and contemporary figures have therefore been alleged to be part of a cabal that operates through many front organizations to orchestrate significant political and financial events, ranging from causing systemic crises to pushing through controversial policies, at both national and international levels, as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination.[3][4][5][6][7]
Before the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two American countercultures, primarily the militantly anti-government right and secondarily that part of fundamentalist Christianity concerned with the end-time emergence of the Antichrist.[8] Skeptics, such as Michael Barkun and Chip Berlet, observed that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about a New World Order had not only been embraced by many seekers of stigmatized knowledge but had seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating a period during the late 20th and early 21st centuries in the United States where people are actively preparing for apocalyptic millenarian scenarios.[4][6]
Those political scientists are concerned that mass hysteria over New World Order conspiracy theories could eventually have devastating effects on American political life, ranging from escalating lone-wolf terrorism to the rise to power of authoritarian ultranationalist demagogues.[4][6][9]
Contents
History of the term
General usage (Pre-Cold War)
During the 20th century, political figures such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history characterised by a dramatic change in world political thought and in the global balance of power after World War I and World War II.[10]
The interwar and post-World War II period were seen as opportunities to implement idealistic proposals for global governance by collective efforts to address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to resolve, while nevertheless respecting the right of nations to self-determination. Such collective initiatives manifested in the formation of intergovernmental organizations such as the League of Nations in 1920, the United Nations (UN) in 1945, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949, along with international regimes such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), implemented to maintain a cooperative balance of power and facilitate reconciliation between nations to prevent the prospect of another global conflict. These cosmopolitan efforts to instill liberal internationalism were regularly criticized and opposed by American paleoconservative business nationalists from the 1930s on.[11][need quotation to verify]
Progressives welcomed international organizations and regimes such as the United Nations in the aftermath of the two World Wars, but argued that these initiatives suffered from a democratic deficit and were therefore inadequate not only to prevent another world war but to foster global justice, as the UN was chartered to be a free association of sovereign nation-states rather than a transition to democratic world government. Thus, cosmopolitan activists around the globe, perceiving the IGOs as too ineffectual for global change, formed a world federalist movement.[12]
British writer and futurist H. G. Wells went further than progressives in the 1940s, by appropriating and redefining the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state and of a planned economy, garnering popularity in state socialist circles.[13][14]
Usage as reference to a conspiracy (Cold War era)
During the Second Red Scare, both secular and Christian right American agitators, largely influenced by the work of Canadian conspiracy theorist William Guy Carr, increasingly embraced and spread dubious fears of Freemasons, Illuminati and Jews as the alleged driving forces behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of "Godless communism", in the form of an atheistic, bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as the "Red Menace", became the focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The Red Scare came to shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the United States, which is that liberals and progressives, with their welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign aid, supposedly contribute to a gradual process of global collectivism that will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communistic/collectivist one-world government.[15] James Warburg, appearing before the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in 1950, famously stated: "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."[16]
Right-wing populist advocacy groups with a paleoconservative world-view, such as the John Birch Society, disseminated a multitude of conspiracy theories in the 1960s claiming that the governments of both the United States and the Soviet Union were controlled by a cabal of corporate internationalists, "greedy" bankers and corrupt politicians who were intent on using the UN as the vehicle to create a "One World Government". This anti-globalist conspiracism fueled the campaign for U.S. withdrawal from the UN. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the establishment of the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913 by international bankers, whom she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as a shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, many readers would have interpreted "international bankers" as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschild family.[15]
Arguing that the term "New World Order" is used by a secretive global elite dedicated to the eradication of the sovereignty of the world's nations, American writer Gary Allen—in his books None Dare Call It Conspiracy (1971), Rockefeller: Campaigning for the New World Order (1974), and Say "No!" to the New World Order (1987)—articulated the anti-globalist theme of contemporary right-wing conspiracism in the U.S. After the fall of communism in the early 1990s, the de facto subject of New World Order conspiracism shifted from crypto-communists, perceived to be plotting to establish an atheistic world communist government, to globalists, perceived to be plotting to generally implement a collectivist, unified world government ultimately controlled by an untouchable oligarchy of international bankers, corrupt politicians, and corporatists, or alternatively, the United Nations itself. The shift in perception was inspired by growing opposition to corporate internationalism on the American right in the 1990s.[15]
In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on 11 September 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H. W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:
Until now, the world we've known has been a world divided—a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the principles of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ..." A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.[17]
The New York Times observed that progressives were denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial ambitions in the Middle East at the time, while conservatives rejected any new security arrangements altogether and fulminated about any possibility of a UN revival.[18]
Chip Berlet, an American investigative reporter specializing in the study of right-wing movements in the U.S., wrote that the Christian and secular far right were especially terrified by Bush's speech. Fundamentalist Christian groups interpreted Bush's words as signaling the End Times, while more secular theorists approached it from an anti-communist and anti-collectivist standpoint and feared for a hegemony over all countries by the United Nations.[4]
Post–Cold War usage
American televangelist Pat Robertson wrote the 1991 best-selling book The New World Order
American televangelist Pat Robertson, with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order, became the most prominent Christian disseminator of conspiracy theories about recent American history. He describes a scenario where Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging people constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.[6]
It was observed that, throughout the 1990s, the galvanizing language used by conspiracy theorists such as Linda Thompson, Mark Koernke and Robert K. Spear led to militancy and the rise of the militia movement.[19] The militia movement's anti-government ideology was (and is) spread through speeches at rallies and meetings, books and videotapes sold at gun shows, shortwave and satellite radio, fax networks and computer bulletin boards.[15] It has been argued that it was overnight AM radio shows and propagandistic viral content on the internet that most effectively contributed to more extremist responses to the perceived threat of the New World Order. This led to the substantial growth of New World Order conspiracism, with it retroactively finding its way into the previously apolitical literature of numerous Kennedy assassinologists, ufologists, lost land theorists and—partially inspired by fears surrounding the "Satanic panic"—occultists. From the mid-1990s onward, the amorphous appeal of those subcultures transmitted New World Order conspiracism to a larger audience of seekers of stigmatized knowledge, with the common characteristic of disillusionment of political efficacy.[6]
From the mid-1990s to the early 2000s, Hollywood conspiracy-thriller television shows and films also played a role in introducing a general audience to various fringe and esoteric theories related to New World Order conspiracism—which by that point had developed to include black helicopters, FEMA "concentration camps", etc.—theories which for decades previously were confined to largely right-wing subcultures. The 1993–2002 television series The X-Files, the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory and the 1998 film The X-Files: Fight the Future are often cited as notable examples.[6]
Following the start of the 21st century, and specifically during the late-2000s financial crisis, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown[20] and Henry Kissinger,[21] used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a comprehensive reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods" taking into account emerging markets such as China and India. These public declarations reinvigorated New World Order conspiracism, culminating in talk-show host Sean Hannity stating on his Fox News program Hannity that the "conspiracy theorists were right".[22] Progressive media-watchdog groups have repeatedly criticized Fox News in general, and its now-defunct opinion show Glenn Beck in particular, for not only disseminating New World Order conspiracy theories to mainstream audiences, but possibly agitating so-called "lone wolf" extremism, particularly from the radical right.[23][24]
In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists—such as American radio host Alex Jones—who vigorously oppose what they perceive as an emerging New World Order.[25] The growing dissemination and popularity of conspiracy theories has also created an alliance between right-wing agitators and hip hop music's left-wing rappers (such as KRS-One, Professor Griff of Public Enemy and Immortal Technique), illustrating how anti-elitist conspiracism can create unlikely political allies in efforts to oppose a political system.[26]
Conspiracy theories
There are numerous systemic conspiracy theories through which the concept of a New World Order is viewed. The following is a list of the major ones in roughly chronological order:[27]
End time
📷
John Nelson Darby
Since the 19th century, many apocalyptic millennial Christian eschatologists, starting with John Nelson Darby, have predicted a globalist conspiracy to impose a tyrannical New World Order governing structure as the fulfillment of prophecies about the "end time" in the Bible, specifically in the Book of Ezekiel, the Book of Daniel, the Olivet discourse found in the Synoptic Gospels and the Book of Revelation.[28] They claim that people who have made a deal with the Devil to gain wealth and power have become pawns in a supernatural chess game to move humanity into accepting a utopian world government that rests on the spiritual foundations of a syncretic-messianic world religion, which will later reveal itself to be a dystopian world empire that imposes the imperial cult of an “Unholy Trinity” of Satan, the Antichrist and the False Prophet. In many contemporary Christian conspiracy theories, the False Prophet will be either the last pope of the Catholic Church (groomed and installed by an Alta Vendita or Jesuit conspiracy), a guru from the New Age movement, or even the leader of an elite fundamentalist Christian organization like the Fellowship, while the Antichrist will be either the President of the European Union, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, or even the Caliph of a pan-Islamic state.[6][28]
Some of the most vocal critics of end-time conspiracy theories come from within Christianity.[15] In 1993, historian Bruce Barron wrote a stern rebuke of apocalyptic Christian conspiracism in the Christian Research Journal, when reviewing Robertson's 1991 book The New World Order.[29] Another critique can be found in historian Gregory S. Camp's 1997 book Selling Fear: Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia.[3] Religious studies scholar Richard T. Hughes argues that "New World Order" rhetoric libels the Christian faith, since the "New World Order" as defined by Christian conspiracy theorists has no basis in the Bible whatsoever. Furthermore, he argues that not only is this idea unbiblical, it is positively anti-biblical and fundamentally anti-Christian, because by misinterpreting key passages in the Book of Revelation, it turns a comforting message about the coming kingdom of God into one of fear, panic and despair in the face of an allegedly approaching one-world government.[28] Progressive Christians, such as preacher-theologian Peter J. Gomes, caution Christian fundamentalists that a "spirit of fear" can distort scripture and history through dangerously combining biblical literalism, apocalyptic timetables, demonization and oppressive prejudices,[30][31] while Camp warns of the "very real danger that Christians could pick up some extra spiritual baggage" by credulously embracing conspiracy theories.[3] They therefore call on Christians who indulge in conspiracism to repent.[32][33]
Freemasonry
Main article: Masonic conspiracy theories
Freemasonry is one of the world's oldest secular fraternal organizations and arose during late 16th–early 17th century Britain. Over the years a number of allegations and conspiracy theories have been directed towards Freemasonry, including the allegation that Freemasons have a hidden political agenda and are conspiring to bring about a New World Order, a world government organized according to Masonic principles or governed only by Freemasons.[15]
The esoteric nature of Masonic symbolism and rites led to Freemasons first being accused of secretly practising Satanism in the late 18th century.[15] The original allegation of a conspiracy within Freemasonry to subvert religions and governments in order to take over the world traces back to Scottish author John Robison, whose reactionary conspiracy theories crossed the Atlantic and influenced outbreaks of Protestant anti-Masonry in the United States during the 19th century.[15] In the 1890s, French writer Léo Taxil wrote a series of pamphlets and books denouncing Freemasonry and charging their lodges with worshiping Lucifer as the Supreme Being and Great Architect of the Universe. Despite the fact that Taxil admitted that his claims were all a hoax, they were and still are believed and repeated by numerous conspiracy theorists and had a huge influence on subsequent anti-Masonic claims about Freemasonry.[34]
Some conspiracy theorists eventually speculated that some Founding Fathers of the United States, such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, were having Masonic sacred geometric designs interwoven into American society, particularly in the Great Seal of the United States, the United States one-dollar bill, the architecture of National Mall landmarks and the streets and highways of Washington, D.C., as part of a master plan to create the first "Masonic government" as a model for the coming New World Order.[6]
📷
A Masonic Lodge room
Freemasons rebut these claims of a Masonic conspiracy. Freemasonry, which promotes rationalism, places no power in occult symbols themselves, and it is not a part of its principles to view the drawing of symbols, no matter how large, as an act of consolidating or controlling power.[35] Furthermore, there is no published information establishing the Masonic membership of the men responsible for the design of the Great Seal.[35][36] While conspiracy theorists assert that there are elements of Masonic influence on the Great Seal of the United States, and that these elements were intentionally or unintentionally used because the creators were familiar with the symbols,[37] in fact, the all-seeing Eye of Providence and the unfinished pyramid were symbols used as much outside Masonic lodges as within them in the late 18th century, therefore the designers were drawing from common esoteric symbols.[38] The Latin phrase "novus ordo seclorum", appearing on the reverse side of the Great Seal since 1782 and on the back of the one-dollar bill since 1935, translates to "New Order of the Ages",[1] and alludes to the beginning of an era where the United States of America is an independent nation-state; it is often mistranslated by conspiracy theorists as "New World Order".[2]
Although the European continental branch of Freemasonry has organizations that allow political discussion within their Masonic Lodges, Masonic researcher Trevor W. McKeown argues that the accusations ignore several facts. Firstly, the many Grand Lodges are independent and sovereign, meaning they act on their own and do not have a common agenda. The points of belief of the various lodges often differ. Secondly, famous individual Freemasons have always held views that span the political spectrum and show no particular pattern or preference. As such, the term "Masonic government" is erroneous; there is no consensus among Freemasons about what an ideal government would look like.[39]
Illuminati
📷
Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, an 18th-century Bavarian liberal and secular secret society
The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded by university professor Adam Weishaupt on 1 May 1776, in Upper Bavaria, Germany. The movement consisted of advocates of freethought, secularism, liberalism, republicanism, and gender equality, recruited from the German Masonic Lodges, who sought to teach rationalism through mystery schools. In 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken up and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his preemptive campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the Bavarian monarchy and its state religion, Roman Catholicism.[40] There is no evidence that the Bavarian Illuminati survived its suppression in 1785.[41]
In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati had survived their suppression and become the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being subversives who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a revolutionary wave in Europe and the rest of the world in order to spread the most radical ideas and movements of the Enlightenment—anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism—and to create a world noocracy and cult of reason. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of the European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent.[41]
During the interwar period of the 20th century, fascist propagandists, such as British revisionist historian Nesta Helen Webster and American socialite Edith Starr Miller, not only popularized the myth of an Illuminati conspiracy but claimed that it was a subversive secret society which served the Jewish elites that supposedly propped up both finance capitalism and Soviet communism in order to divide and rule the world. American evangelist Gerald Burton Winrod and other conspiracy theorists within the fundamentalist Christian movement in the United States—which emerged in the 1910s as a backlash against the principles of Enlightenment secular humanism, modernism, and liberalism—became the main channel of dissemination of Illuminati conspiracy theories in the U.S.. Right-wing populists, such as members of the John Birch Society, subsequently began speculating that some collegiate fraternities (Skull and Bones), gentlemen's clubs (Bohemian Club), and think tanks (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission) of the American upper class are front organizations of the Illuminati, which they accuse of plotting to create a New World Order through a one-world government.[6]
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an antisemitic canard, originally published in Russian in 1903, alleging a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy to achieve world domination. The text purports to be the minutes of the secret meetings of a cabal of Jewish masterminds, which has co-opted Freemasonry and is plotting to rule the world on behalf of all Jews because they believe themselves to be the chosen people of God.[42]
The Protocols incorporate many of the core conspiracist themes outlined in the Robison and Barruel attacks on the Freemasons, and overlay them with antisemitic allegations about anti-Tsarist movements in Russia. The Protocols reflect themes similar to more general critiques of Enlightenment liberalism by conservative aristocrats who support monarchies and state religions. The interpretation intended by the publication of The Protocols is that if one peels away the layers of the Masonic conspiracy, past the Illuminati, one finds the rotten Jewish core.[15]
📷
Cover of a 1920 copy of The Jewish Peril
Numerous polemicists, such as Irish journalist Philip Graves in a 1921 article in The Times, and British academic Norman Cohn in his 1967 book Warrant for Genocide, have proven The Protocols to be both a hoax and a clear case of plagiarism. There is general agreement that Russian-French writer and political activist Matvei Golovinski fabricated the text for Okhrana, the secret police of the Russian Empire, as a work of counter-revolutionary propaganda prior to the 1905 Russian Revolution, by plagiarizing, almost word for word in some passages, from The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, a 19th-century satire against Napoleon III of France written by French political satirist and Legitimist militant Maurice Joly.[43]
Responsible for feeding many antisemitic and anti-Masonic mass hysterias of the 20th century, The Protocols has been influential in the development of some conspiracy theories, including some New World Order theories, and appears repeatedly in certain contemporary conspiracy literature.[6] For example, the authors of the 1982 controversial book The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail concluded that The Protocols was the most persuasive piece of evidence for the existence and activities of the Priory of Sion. They speculated that this secret society was working behind the scenes to establish a theocratic "United States of Europe". Politically and religiously unified through the imperial cult of a Merovingian Great Monarch—supposedly descended from a Jesus bloodline—who occupies both the throne of Europe and the Holy See, this "Holy European Empire" would become the hyperpower of the 21st century.[44]
Although the Priory of Sion itself has been exhaustively debunked by journalists and scholars as a hoax,[45] some apocalyptic millenarian Christian eschatologists who believe The Protocols is authentic became convinced that the Priory of Sion was a fulfillment of prophecies found in the Book of Revelation and further proof of an anti-Christian conspiracy of epic proportions signaling the imminence of a New World Order.[46]
Skeptics argue that the current gambit of contemporary conspiracy theorists who use The Protocols is to claim that they "really" come from some group other than the Jews, such as fallen angels or alien invaders. Although it is hard to determine whether the conspiracy-minded actually believe this or are simply trying to sanitize a discredited text, skeptics argue that it does not make much difference, since they leave the actual, antisemitic text unchanged. The result is to give The Protocols credibility and circulation.[8]
Round Table
During the second half of Britain's "imperial century" between 1815 and 1914, English-born South African businessman, mining magnate and politician Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an "Imperial Federation" to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, written in 1877 at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal:
To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.[47]
📷
Magnate and colonist Cecil Rhodes advocated a secret society which would make Britain control the Earth
In 1890, thirteen years after "his now famous will," Rhodes elaborated on the same idea: establishment of "England everywhere," which would "ultimately lead to the cessation of all wars, and one language throughout the world." "The only thing feasible to carry out this idea is a secret society gradually absorbing the wealth of the world ["and human minds of the higher order"] to be devoted to such an object."[48]
Rhodes also concentrated on the Rhodes Scholarship, which had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in 1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared world view among future British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at the University of Oxford.[47]
Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end, Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and, with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to elicit their support.[49] The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949 but it would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner and Curtis.
The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period. Originally envisioned as a group of American and British scholars and diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S. secretary of state Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on 29 July 1921. The first of the council's projects was a quarterly journal launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs.[50] The Trilateral Commission was founded in July 1973, at the initiative of American banker David Rockefeller, who was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. It is a private organization established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations.
In the 1960s, right-wing populist individuals and groups with a paleoconservative worldview, such as members of the John Birch Society, were the first to combine and spread a business nationalist critique of corporate internationalists networked through think tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations with a grand conspiracy theory casting them as front organizations for the Round Table of the "Anglo-American Establishment", which are financed by an "international banking cabal" that has supposedly been plotting from the late 19th century on to impose an oligarchic new world order through a global financial system. Anti-globalist conspiracy theorists therefore fear that international bankers are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements.[51]
The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of the American Old Right (W. Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to substantiate this view, even though Quigley argued that the Establishment is not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic elites in the United Kingdom and the United States. Quigley also argued that, although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today the Round Table is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.[51]
Larry McDonald, the second president of the John Birch Society and a conservative Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives who represented the 7th congressional district of Georgia, wrote a foreword for Allen's 1976 book The Rockefeller File, wherein he claimed that the Rockefellers and their allies were driven by a desire to create a one-world government that combined "super-capitalism" with communism and would be fully under their control. He saw a conspiracy plot that was "international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."[52]
(…)
New Age
British neo-Theosophical occultist Alice Bailey, one of the founders of the so-called New Age movement, prophesied in 1940 the eventual victory of the Allies of World War II over the Axis powers (which occurred in 1945) and the establishment by the Allies of a political and religious New World Order. She saw a federal world government as the culmination of Wells' Open Conspiracy but favorably argued that it would be synarchist because it was guided by the Masters of the Ancient Wisdom, intent on preparing humanity for the mystical second coming of Christ, and the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. According to Bailey, a group of ascended masters called the Great White Brotherhood works on the "inner planes" to oversee the transition to the New World Order but, for now, the members of this Spiritual Hierarchy are only known to a few occult scientists, with whom they communicate telepathically, but as the need for their personal involvement in the plan increases, there will be an "Externalization of the Hierarchy" and everyone will know of their presence on Earth.[59]
📷
New Age author Alice Bailey's writings have been condemned by Christian right conspiracy theorists
Bailey's writings, along with American writer Marilyn Ferguson's 1980 book The Aquarian Conspiracy, contributed to conspiracy theorists of the Christian right viewing the New Age movement as the "false religion" that would supersede Christianity in a New World Order.[60] Skeptics argue that the term "New Age movement" is a misnomer, generally used by conspiracy theorists as a catch-all rubric for any new religious movement that is not fundamentalist Christian. By this logic, anything that is not Christian is by definition actively and willfully anti-Christian.[61]
Paradoxically, since the first decade of the 21st century, New World Order conspiracism is increasingly being embraced and propagandized by New Age occultists, who are people bored by rationalism and drawn to stigmatized knowledge—such as alternative medicine, astrology, quantum mysticism, spiritualism, and theosophy.[6] Thus, New Age conspiracy theorists, such as the makers of documentary films like Esoteric Agenda, claim that globalists who plot on behalf of the New World Order are simply misusing occultism for Machiavellian ends, such as adopting 21 December 2012 as the exact date for the establishment of the New World Order for the purpose of taking advantage of the growing 2012 phenomenon, which has its origins in the fringe Mayanist theories of New Age writers José Argüelles, Terence McKenna, and Daniel Pinchbeck.
Skeptics argue that the connection of conspiracy theorists and occultists follows from their common fallacious premises. First, any widely accepted belief must necessarily be false. Second, stigmatized knowledge—what the Establishment spurns—must be true. The result is a large, self-referential network in which, for example, some UFO religionists promote anti-Jewish phobias while some antisemites practice Peruvian shamanism.[6]
Fourth Reich
📷
American writer Jim Marrs claimed that former Nazis and their sympathizers have been continuing Nazi policies worldwide, especially in the United States
Conspiracy theorists often use the term "Fourth Reich" simply as a pejorative synonym for the "New World Order" to imply that its state ideology and government will be similar to Germany's Third Reich.[citation needed]
Conspiracy theorists, such as American writer Jim Marrs, claim that some ex-Nazis, who survived the fall of the Greater German Reich, along with sympathizers in the United States and elsewhere, given haven by organizations like ODESSA and Die Spinne, have been working behind the scenes since the end of World War II to enact at least some principles of Nazism (e.g., militarism, imperialism, widespread spying on citizens, corporatism, the use of propaganda to manufacture a national consensus) into culture, government, and business worldwide, but primarily in the U.S. They cite the influence of ex-Nazi scientists brought in under Operation Paperclip to help advance aerospace manufacturing in the U.S. with technological principles from Nazi UFOs, and the acquisition and creation of conglomerates by ex-Nazis and their sympathizers after the war, in both Europe and the U.S.[62]
This neo-Nazi conspiracy is said to be animated by an "Iron Dream" in which the American Empire, having thwarted the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy and overthrown its Zionist Occupation Government, gradually establishes a Fourth Reich formerly known as the "Western Imperium"—a pan-Aryan world empire modeled after Adolf Hitler's New Order—which reverses the "decline of the West" and ushers a golden age of white supremacy.[63]
Skeptics argue that conspiracy theorists grossly overestimate the influence of ex-Nazis and neo-Nazis on American society, and point out that political repression at home and imperialism abroad have a long history in the United States that predates the 20th century. Some political scientists, such as Sheldon Wolin, have expressed concern that the twin forces of democratic deficit and superpower status have paved the way in the U.S. for the emergence of an inverted totalitarianism which contradicts many principles of Nazism.[64]
Alien invasion
(…)
Brave New World
Antiscience and neo-Luddite conspiracy theorists emphasize technology forecasting in their New World Order conspiracy theories. They speculate that the global power elite are reactionary modernists pursuing a transhumanist agenda to develop and use human enhancement technologies in order to become a "posthuman ruling caste", while change accelerates toward a technological singularity—a theorized future point of discontinuity when events will accelerate at such a pace that normal unenhanced humans will be unable to predict or even understand the rapid changes occurring in the world around them. Conspiracy theorists fear the outcome will either be the emergence of a Brave New World-like dystopia—a "Brave New World Order"—or the extinction of the human species.[67]
Democratic transhumanists, such as American sociologist James Hughes, counter that many influential members of the United States Establishment are bioconservatives strongly opposed to human enhancement, as demonstrated by President Bush's Council on Bioethics's proposed international treaty prohibiting human cloning and germline engineering. Furthermore, he argues that conspiracy theorists underestimate how fringe the transhumanist movement really is.[68]
Postulated implementations
Just as there are several overlapping or conflicting theories among conspiracists about the nature of the New World Order, so are there several beliefs about how its architects and planners will implement it:
Gradualism
(…)
Coup d'état
(…)
Mass surveillance
Part of a series on
Global surveillance
Disclosures
· Origins
· Pre-2013
· 2013–present
· Reactions
Systems
· XKeyscore
· PRISM
· ECHELON
· Carnivore
· Dishfire
· Stone Ghost
· Tempora
· Frenchelon
· Fairview
· MYSTIC
· DCSN
· Boundless Informant
· Bullrun
· Pinwale
· Stingray
· SORM
· RAMPART-A
Agencies
· NSA
· CSE
· BND
· CNI
· ASIO
· DGSE
· Five Eyes
· FSB
· MSS
People
· Michael S. Rogers
· Keith Alexander
· James Bamford
· James Clapper
· Duncan Campbell
· Edward Snowden
· Russ Tice
· George W. Bush
· Barack Obama
· Julian Assange
Places
· The Doughnut
· Fort Meade
· Menwith Hill
· Pine Gap
· Southern Cross Cable
· Utah Data Center
· Bad Aibling Station
· Dagger Complex
Laws
· Five Eyes
o UKUSA Agreement
o Lustre
· U.S.
o USA Freedom Act
o FISA amendments
· EU
o Data Retention Directive
o Data Protection Directive
Proposed changes
· U.S.
o FISA Improvements Act
o Other proposals
Concepts
· Mass surveillance
· Culture of fear
· Secure communication
· SIGINT
· Call detail record
· Surveillance issues in smart cities
Related topics
· Espionage
· Intelligence agency
· Cryptography
o Tor
o VPNs
o TLS
· Human rights
o Privacy
o Liberty
· Satellites
· Stop Watching Us
· Nothing to hide argument
· v
· t
· e
Conspiracy theorists concerned with surveillance abuse believe that the New World Order is being implemented by the cult of intelligence at the core of the surveillance-industrial complex through mass surveillance and the use of Social Security numbers, the bar-coding of retail goods with Universal Product Code markings, and, most recently, RFID tagging by microchip implants.[6]
(…)
Occultism
Conspiracy theorists of the Christian right, starting with British revisionist historian Nesta Helen Webster, believe there is an ancient occult conspiracy—started by the first mystagogues of Gnosticism and perpetuated by their alleged esoteric successors, such as the Kabbalists, Cathars, Knights Templar, Hermeticists, Rosicrucians, Freemasons, and, ultimately, the Illuminati—which seeks to subvert the Judeo-Christian foundations of the Western world and implement the New World Order through a one-world religion that prepares the masses to embrace the imperial cult of the Antichrist.[6] More broadly, they speculate that globalists who plot on behalf of a New World Order are directed by occult agencies of some sort: unknown superiors, spiritual hierarchies, demons, fallen angels or Lucifer. They believe that these conspirators use the power of occult sciences (numerology), symbols (Eye of Providence), rituals (Masonic degrees), monuments (National Mall landmarks), buildings (Manitoba Legislative Building[83]) and facilities (Denver International Airport) to advance their plot to rule the world.[6][84]
For example, in June 1979, an unknown benefactor under the pseudonym "R. C. Christian" had a huge granite megalith built in the U.S. state of Georgia, which acts like a compass, calendar, and clock. A message comprising ten guides is inscribed on the occult structure in many languages to serve as instructions for survivors of a doomsday event to establish a more enlightened and sustainable civilization than the one which was destroyed. The "Georgia Guidestones" have subsequently become a spiritual and political Rorschach test onto which any number of ideas can be imposed. Some New Agers and neo-pagans revere it as a ley-line power nexus while a few conspiracy theorists are convinced that they are engraved with the New World Order's anti-Christian "Ten Commandments." Should the Guidestones survive for centuries as their creators intended, many more meanings could arise, equally unrelated to the designer's original intention.[85]
Skeptics argue that the demonization of Western esotericism by conspiracy theorists is rooted in religious intolerance but also in the same moral panics that have fueled witch trials in the Early Modern period, and satanic ritual abuse allegations in the United States.[6]
Population control
Conspiracy theorists believe that the New World Order will also be implemented through the use of human population control in order to more easily monitor and control the movement of individuals.[6]
The means range from stopping the growth of human societies through reproductive health and family planning programs, which promote abstinence, contraception and abortion, or intentionally reducing the bulk of the world population through genocides by mongering unnecessary wars, through plagues by engineering emergent viruses and tainting vaccines, and through environmental disasters by controlling the weather (HAARP, chemtrails), etc. Conspiracy theorists argue that globalists plotting on behalf of a New World Order are neo-Malthusians who engage in overpopulation and climate change alarmism in order to create public support for coercive population control and ultimately world government. Agenda 21 is condemned as "reconcentrating" people into urban areas and depopulating rural ones, even generating a dystopian novel by Glenn Beck where single-family homes are a distant memory.
(…)
Mind control
Social critics accuse governments, corporations, and the mass media of being involved in the manufacturing of a national consensus and, paradoxically, a culture of fear due to the potential for increased social control that a mistrustful and mutually fearing population might offer to those in power. The worst fear of some conspiracy theorists, however, is that the New World Order will be implemented through the use of mind control—a broad range of tactics able to subvert an individual's control of his or her own thinking, behavior, emotions, or decisions. These tactics are said to include everything from Manchurian candidate-style brainwashing of sleeper agents (Project MKULTRA, "Project Monarch") to engineering psychological operations (water fluoridation, subliminal advertising, "Silent Sound Spread Spectrum", MEDUSA) and parapsychological operations (Stargate Project) to influence the masses.[90] The concept of wearing a tin foil hat for protection from such threats has become a popular stereotype and term of derision; the phrase serves as a byword for paranoia and is associated with conspiracy theorists.
Skeptics argue that the paranoia behind a conspiracy theorist's obsession with mind control, population control, occultism, surveillance abuse, Big Business, Big Government, and globalization arises from a combination of two factors, when he or she: 1) holds strong individualist values and 2) lacks power. The first attribute refers to people who care deeply about an individual's right to make their own choices and direct their own lives without interference or obligations to a larger system (like the government), but combine this with a sense of powerlessness in one's own life, and one gets what some psychologists call "agency panic," intense anxiety about an apparent loss of autonomy to outside forces or regulators. When fervent individualists feel that they cannot exercise their independence, they experience a crisis and assume that larger forces are to blame for usurping this freedom.[91][92]
Alleged conspirators
(…)
Criticism
(…)
Текстът е много дълъг, вж. всичко тук:
[urlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)[/url
See also
|
